Abstract:Fair allocation of indivisible goods has attracted extensive attention over the last two decades, yielding numerous elegant algorithmic results and producing challenging open questions. The problem becomes much harder in the presence of strategic agents. Ideally, one would want to design truthful mechanisms that produce allocations with fairness guarantees. However, in the standard setting without monetary transfers, it is generally impossible to have truthful mechanisms that provide nontrivial fairness guarantees. Recently, Amanatidis et al. [Amanatidis G, Birmpas G, Fusco F, Lazos P, Leonardi S, Reiffenhäuser R (2023) Allocating indivisible goods to strategic agents: Pure Nash equilibria and fairness. Math. Oper. Res., ePub ahead of print November 30, https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.2022.0058 ] suggested the study of mechanisms that produce fair allocations in their equilibria. Specifically, when the agents have additive valuation functions, the simple Round-Robin algorithm always has pure Nash equilibria, and the corresponding allocations are envy-free up to one good (EF1) with respect to the agents’ true valuation functions. Following this agenda, we show that this outstanding property of the Round-Robin mechanism extends much beyond the above default assumption of additivity. In particular, we prove that for agents with cancelable valuation functions (a natural class that contains, e.g., additive and budget-additive functions), this simple mechanism always has equilibria, and even its approximate equilibria correspond to approximately EF1 allocations with respect to the agents’ true valuation functions. Furthermore, we show that the approximate EF1 fairness of approximate equilibria surprisingly holds for the important class of submodular valuation functions as well, even though exact equilibria fail to exist. Funding: This work was supported by the Horizon 2020 European Research Council Advanced Grant “AMDROMA: Algorithmic and Mechanism Design Research in Online Markets” [Grant 788893], the Ministero dell’Università e della Ricerca Research project of national interest (PRIN) “ALGADIMAR: Algorithms, Games, and Digital Markets,” the Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Veni Project “Algorithmic Fair Division in Dynamic, Socially Constrained Environments” [Grant VI.Veni.192.153], and the National Recovery and Resilience Plan Greece 2.0 funded by the European Union under the NextGenerationEU Program [Grant MIS 5154714].

Allocation Mechanisms in Decentralized Exchange Markets with Frictions

Mechanism Design with Exchangeable Allocations

Online Resource Sharing via Dynamic Max-Min Fairness: Efficiency, Robustness and Non-Stationarity

Fair Division with Interdependent Values

Fair and Efficient Allocations Without Obvious Manipulations

Round-Robin Beyond Additive Agents: Existence and Fairness of Approximate Equilibria

Optimal Dynamic Allocation: Simplicity through Information Design

Fair Allocation in Dynamic Mechanism Design

On the Efficiency of Sharing Economy Networks

Transaction Mechanism Design in Decentralized Computational Market

Simple and Near-Optimal Mechanisms For Market Intermediation

Epistemic EFX Allocations Exist for Monotone Valuations

Randomized Assignments for Barter Exchanges: Fairness vs. Efficiency.

Price of Anarchy in a Double-Sided Critical Distribution System

Decentralized Pure Exchange Processes on Networks

Quantifying Inefficiency of Fair Cost-Sharing Mechanisms for Sharing Economy

Congestion Allocation for Distributed Networks: an Experimental Study

Best-of-Both-Worlds Fair Allocation of Indivisible and Mixed Goods

Optimal Design of Automated Market Makers on Decentralized Exchanges

Fair and Efficient Allocations with Limited Demands