Randomized Assignments for Barter Exchanges: Fairness vs. Efficiency.

Wenyi Fang,Aris Filos-Ratsikas,Søren Kristoffer Stiil Frederiksen,Pingzhong Tang,Song Zuo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23114-3_32

2015-01-01

Abstract:We study fairness and efficiency properties of randomized algorithms for barter exchanges with direct applications to kidney exchange problems. It is well documented that randomization can serve as a tool to ensure fairness among participants. However, in many applications, practical constraints often restrict the maximum allowed cycle-length of the exchange and for randomized algorithms, this imposes constraints of the cycle-length of every realized exchange in their decomposition. We prove that standard fairness properties such as envy-freeness or symmetry are incompatible with even the weakest notion of economic efficiency in this setting. On the plus side, we adapt some well-known matching mechanisms to incorporate the restricted cycle constraint and evaluate their performance experimentally on instances of the kidney exchange problem, showing tradeoffs between fairness and efficiency.