HoLEP and TUVP for Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia:a Comparison of Their Operation Time

CHEN Jun,XU Zhi-shun,LIU Yu-qiang,SHI Ben-kang,JIANG Xian-zhou,DONG De-xin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-9430.2006.03.009
2006-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the operation time of HoLEP and TUVP for the treatment of BPH.Methods Thirty four patients were treated by HoLEP and seventy three patients were treated by TUVP.Curve estimation was performed for the relationship between prostate weight and operation time of the two methods to compare the operation time of HoLEP and TUVP .Knowledge of differential calculus, geometry and pathoanatomy was used to analyze the change in operation time of the two methods.Results The operation time was significantly longer in the HoLEP group than the TUVP group(t=4.900,P<0.001),but it was shorter than TUVP when HoLEP was used for larger prostate.Conclusions With the increasing in hyperplastic prostate weight, the corresponding prolonged operation time of HoLEP is obviously shorter than TUVP; and the operation time of HoLEP is also shorter than TUVP as for larger prostate.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?