Effect of chromium concentration on microstructure and properties of Fe–3.5B alloy
Shengqiang Ma,Jiandong Xing,Guofeng Liu,Dawei Yi,Hanguang Fu,Jianjun Zhang,Yefei Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2010.07.066
2010-01-01
Abstract:The cast low carbon Fe–3.5B alloys containing various chromium concentrations were prepared in a 10 kg medium frequency induction furnace and the effects of chromium concentration on microstructure and properties of Fe–3.5B alloys have been examined by means of optical microscope (OM), scanning electron microscope (SEM), back-scattered electron microscope (BSE), electron probe microanalyzer (EPMA), energy dispersive spectrum (EDS), X-ray diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and Vickers hardness. As a result, the as-cast structures of Fe–3.5B– X Cr ( X = 0, 2, 5, 8, 12, 18, mass fraction) alloys are mainly composed of dendrite ferrite, martensite, pearlite and boride. The boride in the alloy without chromium addition comprises the eutectic Fe 2 B, which is continuous netlike or fish-bone structure distributed over the metallic matrix. With the increase of chromium concentration in Fe–3.5B alloy, matrix structure turns into the supersaturated α -Fe solid solution while the morphology of boride becomes dispersed due to the transformation of boride from simple Fe 2 B to (Fe,Cr) 2 B when the chromium concentration in Fe–3.5B alloy exceeds 8 wt.%. Meanwhile, some primary M 2 B-type borides may precipitate under this condition. The bulk hardness of the as-cast alloy ranges from 41.8 to 46.8 HRC. However, the bulk hardness of the heat treated alloy rises first and falls later mainly because of the morphology variation of structure. Fracture toughness of boride is improved gradually owing to the entrance of chromium into Fe 2 B, which may be attributed to the change of spatial structure of boride. Keywords Fe–B alloy (Fe,Cr) 2 B boride Fracture toughness Solid solution 1 Introduction Considerable amount of economic loss is brought because of abrasion and corrosion in mechanical parts of machinery and equipment. Therefore, in order to reduce this loss, the research on superior wear-resistant and corrosion-resistant materials has been allotted a high priority in the field of material science recently [1–3] . It is of very important significance to develop excellent wear- and corrosion-resistant materials so as to meet the rigorous environment requirements. The invention of high chromium white cast iron was considered a breakthrough because of its increased toughness compared with plain white cast iron and Ni-hard white cast iron, which is attributed to the improvement of carbide morphology [4,5] . However, the high chromium white cast iron is still a kind of brittle material that cannot meet the requirement of demanding working conditions. Hence, constant research activities are being carried out to produce advanced materials, which are much better than existing wear-resistant materials [6,7] . Recently, much attention has been paid to high boron white cast iron owing to the unique characteristics of boron in steel [8–10] . Investigations have discovered that hardenability, toughness and wear resistance can be improved by adding boron as an alloying element. Since the borides exist in the high boron white cast iron, the study on high boron white cast iron has been widely emphasized by researchers [11–13] . Boride has a higher hardness than carbide when combined with the same element, which gives us the idea to replace the carbides in white cast iron with borides [14] . In addition, carbon is almost undissolved in boride, thus the properties of matrix can be adjusted by carbon content. This should in turn result in improving ductility and fracture toughness, while maintaining the inherently excellent wear resistance. The significance of this approach is that the matrix and hard phases can be adjusted independently by varying carbon and boron contents [4,15,16] . However, there exist many interconnect net-like borides in solidification structure of high boron white cast iron, which damages the continuity of matrix, reduces the toughness and results in fracture in impact environment. Thus, the application of high boron cast alloy is restricted to some extent. Heat treatment and hot deformation are the most common methods used to improve the toughness of cast alloys [17–20] . Nevertheless, heat treatment has little effect on morphology of boride because of lower boron solubility in high boron white cast iron. And hot deformation not only increases the production process and energy consumption, but also is only suitable for the simple-shaped work pieces. Guo and Wang [21,22] reported the solubility and diffusion of boron in Fe–Cr–B alloy. Unfortunately, there is little research about the influence of chromium concentration on the microstructure and properties of Fe–B alloy. The objective of present work aims to study the microstructures and properties of borides in Fe–3.5B alloys with different amount of chromium. As a result, the morphology and microstructure of the boride are improved and the fracture toughness is increased accordingly. 2 Experimental procedure 2.1 Preparation for Fe–3.5B cast alloy The investigated alloys in present work are hypoeutectic high boron white cast iron. The alloys were prepared in a 10 kg medium frequency induction furnace. Initial charge materials were clean low silicon pig iron and steel scrap. Ferro-alloys such as Fe–63 wt.% Cr and Fe–16.28 wt.% B were added to a slag-free molten alloy so as to minimize the oxidation loss and slag formation. When all the alloys were melted in the furnace, 0.10 wt.% pure aluminum was added into the molten alloy to deoxidize at the temperature of 1520–1540 °C. The melt was subsequently super-heated to 1560 °C and transferred into a pre-heated teapot ladle. After removal of any dross and slag, the melt was poured at 1430 °C into the sodium silicate–CO 2 bonded sand moulds, obtaining Y-block ingots following ASTM A781/A 781-M95. The test specimens were cut from the lower part of the Y-block and surface ground to remove 3 mm from the surface and eliminate any oxidized layer. Some of the as-cast specimens were treated at 980 °C for 1 h, quenched in water and then tempered at 200 °C, followed by air cooling. The chemical compositions of Fe–3.5B alloys are listed in Table 1 . 2.2 Microstructure examination The microanalysis of the specimens was carried out using a scanning electron microscope (SEM), a back-scattered electron image (BSE), an X-ray diffraction (XRD), an electron probe microanalysis (EPMA), a transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and an energy dispersive spectrum (EDS) to identify microstructures. For metallographic observations, all specimens were etched in a 4 vol.% nital solution. XRD was performed on a MXP21VAHF diffractometer with Copper Kα radiation coupling continuous scanning at 40 kV and 200 mA as an X-ray source. The specimen was scanned in the 2 θ ranging from 20° to 100° with scanning speed of 2°/min and step space of 0.02°. 2.3 Vickers microindentation fracture toughness test The bulk hardness was measured on an HR-150A Rockwell-hardness tester. The microhardness of boride in Fe–3.5B alloy was also measured by using an HXD-type 1000 Vickers-hardness tester with a load of 100 gf, according the ASTM E384 standard. The indentation cracking method proposed by Palmqvist in 1957 [23] was utilized and the equation used for calculating fracture toughness was as follows [24–29] : (1) K IC = X ⋅ P c 3 / 2 where X is the residual indentation coefficient, which depends on hardness to modulus ratio ( H / E ) of the boride. The constant X is 0.064 ( E / H ) 1/2 , where E and H are the Young's modulus and microhardness, respectively. P is the applied load and the value of E is approximately 290 GPa [24–30] for fracture toughness calculation, and c is the indentation radial cracking length as shown in Fig. 1 . 3 Results 3.1 Solidification microstructure of Fe–3.5B alloys with various chromium concentrations The as-cast solidification microstructures of Fe–3.5B alloys containing various chromium concentrations are shown in Fig. 2 . Fig. 3 is the XRD analysis results of as-cast specimens. From Fig. 2 , the as-cast Fe–3.5B alloys with various chromium concentrations have formed the metallic matrix and eutectic morphologies during the solidification. According to the XRD results (shown in Fig. 3 ), the microstructure of Fe–3.5B alloy is mainly composed of ferrite, martensite, a number of pearlite and eutectic Fe 2 B, which is continuously distributed over the metallic matrix (specimen C0 shown in Fig. 2 (a)). As the chromium concentration increases, there is a tendency that the eutectic boride seems to be scattered. Namely, the continuous netlike or fish-bone structure reduces slightly (shown in Fig. 2 (b)–(d)). When the chromium concentration exceeds 8 wt.%, the morphology of microstructure becomes significantly different. The characteristics that the eutectic boride is continuously distributed over the metallic matrix vanish rapidly. Instead, a great deal of dispersed eutectic boride appears (as shown in Fig. 2 (e) and (f)). Moreover, some primary borides precipitate in the matrix (shown in Fig. 2 (e) and (f)). XRD patterns (C4 and C5 specimen shown in Fig. 3 ) also indicate the presence of many M 2 B-type eutectic borides (M represents both Fe and Cr) in the as-cast Fe–3.5B alloy. SEM analysis of Fe–3.5B alloys with different chromium concentration is shown in Fig. 4 , and Fig. 4 (a) and (c) show the SEM images of as-cast specimen C3 and C5, respectively. The results from EPMA lines in Fig. 4 (a) and (c) indicate that the iron content is lower in boride than in matrix while the chromium is dominant in boride (shown in Fig. 4 (b) and (d)). 3.2 Heat treated microstructure of Fe–3.5B alloy with various chromium concentrations Fig. 5 shows the heat treated microstructures of Fe–3.5B alloy with various chromium concentrations (specimen C2 and C5). From SEM images of specimen C2 and C5 ( Fig. 5 (a) and (b)), it can be seen that there is no difference in eutectic boride between as-cast and heat-treated specimens. However, a number of secondary particles precipitate from the matrix when the quenched specimens (980 °C for 1 h, quenched in water) are tempered at 200 °C (as shown in Fig. 5 (a)–(d)). In addition, more secondary particles precipitate in the matrix of C5 specimen in comparison with that of C2 specimen because of the higher chromium additions (BSE images in Fig. 5 (c) and (d)). Cross-sectional elemental distribution of Fe and Cr by X-ray mapping in Fig. 5 also reveals that the Cr element prevails in the boride (shown in Fig. 5 (e) and (f)). From Fig. 5 , it also indicates that the matrix of Fe–3.5B with high chromium concentration is supersaturated α -Fe solid solution after quenched in water, which leads to the precipitation of many borocarbides. Hence, it can be concluded from the precipitation of secondary particles that the martensite of Fe–3.5B alloys with boron, carbon and chromium is supersaturated solid solution. 3.3 Hardness and fracture toughness of boride in Fe–3.5B alloy with different chromium concentrations The bulk hardness of as-cast and heat treated specimens for C0–C5 alloys are shown in Fig. 6 . Fig. 7 shows the microhardness of matrix in as-cast and heat treated C0–C5 specimens. From Fig. 6 and Fig. 7 , it can be seen clearly that bulk hardness and the microhardness of matrix in as-cast alloys increase with the increase of chromium concentration while heat treated specimens for C0–C5 alloys exhibit different. As the chromium concentration increases, the bulk hardness of heat treated specimens raises firstly, and then falls when the chromium concentration is up to 8 wt.%. This is mainly attributed to morphology change of netlike borides as well as the solution of chromium in the metallic matrix when chromium concentration is increased to certain extent. The chromium concentration in boride was measured by EPMA analysis and the relationships between the fracture toughness and Vickers hardness and chromium concentration in boride of Fe–3.5B alloys are shown in Fig. 8 . It is clearly observed from Fig. 8 , that the Vickers hardness of boride has changed sharply when the chromium element is added to the Fe–3.5B alloys. As chromium content is increased gradually, in comparison with no addition of chromium, Vickers hardness ascends continuously. Its value ranges from 1356.9 to 1859.8 HV 0.1 , namely, about 13.6–18.6 GPa, which is mainly ascribed to the addition of chromium and the formation of Cr-rich boride. As discussed below, Fe atoms in Fe 2 B are substituted by Cr atoms, thus leading to the formation of (Fe,Cr) 2 B. Dybkov [31] also found that the microhardness values vary considerably and the microhardness of (Fe,Cr) 2 B in boronizing layer, HV 0.1 , is 18.0 ± 1.0 GPa, which is also attributed to the non-homogeneity of boride in the boronizing layers. 4 Discussion 4.1 Effect of chromium on microstructure of Fe–3.5B alloy The chromium concentration has a remarkable effect on the as-cast microstructure of Fe–3.5B alloy (as shown in Fig. 2 ). Fig. 9 is the EDS analysis of Fe–3.5B alloys with different chromium concentration in Fig. 4 . Comparing EDS spectrum results of point 1 and point 2 in Fig. 4 (a) (EDS spectrum results shown in Fig. 9 (a) and (b)), the concentration of carbon and silicon elements in matrix of Fe–3.5B alloy is relatively high and these elements promote the formation of pearlite [32,33] . So there exists certain amount of pearlite in the as-cast matrix (as shown in Fig. 2 ). Fig. 9 (c) and (d) is the EDS spectrum of point 3 and point 4 in Fig. 4 (c). Seen from Fig. 9 (a)–(d), it can be obviously observed that the concentration of chromium in borides varies sharply when the chromium is added into Fe–3.5B alloy. Fig. 10 shows the distribution of chromium concentration in matrix and boride measured by EPMA analysis when various chromium concentrations are added into Fe–3.5B alloys. With the increase of chromium concentration in Fe–3.5B alloys, the differential value of chromium concentration between boride and matrix remarkably increases, especially when the chromium concentration in Fe–3.5B alloy exceeds 8 wt.%. It indicates that most of chromium exists in boride. As the chromium concentration increases, the structure of boride is changed (detected by XRD in Fig. 3 ). When the chromium concentration exceeds 12 wt.%, i.e., 18 wt.% for C5 specimen, the atom ratio of Fe to Cr is approximately equal to 1:1 (shown in Fig. 9 (d)), the borides are likely transformed from tetragonal Fe 2 B to orthorhombic (Fe,Cr) 2 B [34–36] . Hence, according to EDS and XRD results, compositionally, the boride may consist of (Fe,Cr) 2 B and Fe 2 B as the chromium concentration exceeds 12 wt.% [37,38] . That is to say, the phase transformation behavior of the alloy would be affected by the presence of high chromium additions [34,35] . The investigations of Ref. [39–41] also confirmed that the Fe–Cr–B alloy coatings, containing the borides of Cr 2 B, Cr 1.65 Fe 0.35 B 0.96 and α -(Fe,Cr) solid solution were formed. However, X-ray diffraction analysis practically does not show the presence of Cr 2 B phase, probably because, firstly, the M 2 B phase and Cr 2 B phase have very similar crystal structures and, secondly, under non-equilibrium conditions, the alloy containing high chromium appears to be single-phase structurally and two-phase compositionally [35,36] . As the chromium concentration is up to 18 wt.% (shown in Fig. 4 (c)), it can be seen that more M 2 B (M represents both Fe and Cr) primary borides precipitate and look like lath distributed in the matrix. Interestingly, there exists a concentration gradient of chromium element near the primary boride (shown in Fig. 4 (c) grey regions adjacent to lath boride). This is probably attributed to the first solidification of primary boride occurs under normal solidification conditions, which consumes more chromium elements, resulting in the formation of chromium depleted zone. Fig. 11 is the bright field TEM micrographs and corresponding selected area diffraction patterns of boride in specimen C0 and C5, respectively. From the as-cast specimen C0 with no chromium addition, shown in Fig. 11 (a) (fish-bone structure of Fe 2 B phase in dark region), it can be obtained from electron diffraction patterns, that the dark region in Fig. 11 (a) can be indexed to Fe 2 B phase, which is a body-centered tetragonal structure and its lattice constant is: a = b = 0.51093 nm, c = 0.42486 nm (namely, c / a = 0.83), whereas M 2 B-type boride in specimen C5 (lath structure of primary M 2 B-type boride shown in dark region of Fig. 11 (b)) is orthorhombic structure. The results analyzed above can also prove the phase transformation of boride from Fe 2 B to (Fe,Cr) 2 B with the increase of high chromium concentration. 4.2 Effect of chromium on composition of M 2 B-type boride precipitated in the Fe–3.5B alloy According to the liquid phase surface of Fe–15%Cr–C–B quaternary system phase diagram [37,42] , the temperature of the investigated Fe–Cr–B alloy, which is adjacent to the precipitation starting temperature of primary borides, is about 1490 °C. It can be seen that M 2 B primary boride generates from the liquid. Taking into consideration the fact that the subsequent solidification of Fe–Cr–B alloy is more complex and it suffers under non-equilibrium solidification condition, thus the primary boride should also precipitate from the melt. From the SEM observation in Fig. 5 , it can be seen that heat treatment has little effects on morphology of boride (shown in Fig. 5 (a) and (b)) mainly owing to the small boron solubility of 0.02 wt.% in austenite [4,21] . Also, primary borides are distributed in the form of long rod in the matrix, and the eutectic borides adjacent to primary boride show a more dispersed distribution while high chromium concentration is added (such as C5 specimen shown in Fig. 5 (b)–(d)). However, more secondary particles precipitate from the matrix (BSE images shown in Fig. 5 (c) and (d)) during the heat treatment when the chromium element is added into Fe–3.5B alloy. XRD result of specimen C5 after heat treatment in Fig. 12 indicates that the secondary precipitation is M 23 (C,B) 6 phase (M presents Fe and Cr) [21] . Moreover, the element surface distribution patterns of Cr and Fe indicate that the Cr element prevails in the M 2 B-type boride (shown in Fig. 5 (e) and (f)). This is because the atom radius ( R Cr = 0.185 nm, R Fe = 0.0.172 nm) and electronegativity ( X P Cr = 1.66 , X P Fe = 1.83 ) of Cr and Fe are very similar, Cr element can dissolve in iron to form a continuously substitutional solid solution, and most Cr atoms replace the atoms of Fe in Fe 2 B lattice. Therefore, it is possible that the replacement of iron atoms undergoes constantly, which leads to the formation of M 2 B boride. So, during the solidification, Cr atoms as the substitution of partial Fe atoms enter the boride. The investigations of Ref. [9,43–45] also indicate the distribution of alloying elements is not homogeneous and boron mainly exists in grain boundaries, only a small amount of boron is distributed in the matrix. So the M 2 (B,C) borocarbide has formed in the B-rich region at the grain boundary, and the chromium element is mainly distributed over the M 2 (B,C) borocarbide. The average composition of eutectic boride for as-cast C0–C5 specimens is confirmed by EPMA measurement, and the EDS results are shown in Table 2 . Table 3 [34,35] is also the composition results of the phases by EPMA measurement in boride layers at Fe–25%Cr alloy–boron interface. Compared with the results in Table 3 , the boride in Fe–3.5B alloy with high chromium concentration mainly consists of (Fe,Cr) 2 B phase, which also proves the presence of (Fe,Cr) 2 B phase. 4.3 Effect of chromium on fracture toughness of boride in Fe–3.5B alloy The fracture toughness ( K IC ) of boride in Fe–3.5B alloys, estimated by the Palmqvist method, displays great difference as the chromium concentration is increased. When the chromium concentration is less than 10.56 wt.% in boride (namely, chromium concentration of 5 wt.% in Fe–3.5B alloy as shown in Fig. 10 ), K IC value (15.3–16.56 MPa m 1/2 as shown in Fig. 8 ) improves slightly, whereas it enhances rapidly from 16.56 to 22.4 MPa m 1/2 (shown in Fig. 8 ) as the chromium concentration ranges from 8.28 to 36.64 wt.% (namely, chromium concentration of 5–18 wt.% in Fe–3.5B alloy as shown in Fig. 10 ). This is because partial Cr element dissolves into the metallic matrix, which reduces the amount of Cr element entering into the boride. When the chromium concentration in Fe–3.5B alloy exceeds 8 wt.%, a large amount of Fe 2 B is transformed into (Fe,Cr) 2 B phase. As discussed above, Fe 2 B has a bbc tetragonal, C16, CuAl 2 -type structure, and its lattice parameters are a = 0.5109 nm, c = 0.4249 nm, c / a = 0.832, while (Fe,Cr) 2 B is orthorhombic structure [37,46] , which may result in the increase of K IC value. Moreover, bond energy of Fe 2 B phase between Fe and B atom is not distributed uniformly at different crystal orientation throughout space, and atomic bond of B–B in Fe 2 B phase is very weak in [0 0 2] direction [47] , which is likely to cause brittleness of Fe 2 B phase, and the addition of chromium may enhance bonding energy of Fe–Fe and B–B atomic bond in weaker direction on spatial distribution and improve brittleness of boride in Fe–3.5B alloy. So the properties of boride are improved. 5 Conclusions The morphology and distribution of borides in Fe–3.5B alloys as well as fracture toughness of borides are investigated and the present work supports the following conclusions: (1) The structure of as-cast Fe–3.5B– X Cr ( X = 0, 2, 5, 8, 12, 18, mass fraction) alloys is mainly composed of dendrite ferrite, martensite, pearlite and borides. Boride without chromium addition comprises Fe 2 B, which is continuous netlike or fish-bone structure distributed over the metallic matrix. (2) With the increase of chromium concentration in Fe–3.5B alloy, matrix structure turns into supersaturated α -Fe solid solution while the morphology of boride becomes dispersed, which is attributed to the transformation of boride from simple Fe 2 B to (Fe,Cr) 2 B when the chromium concentration in Fe–3.5B alloy exceeds 8 wt.%. Meanwhile, some primary M 2 B-type borides may occur under this condition. (3) As chromium concentration is increased, bulk hardness of the as-cast alloy ranges from 41.8 to 46.8 HRC while the heat treated alloy rises firstly and falls later mainly because of the morphology change of the boride. (4) Fracture toughness of boride is improved gradually owing to the entrance of chromium atoms into the Fe 2 B, which may be attributed to the change of spatial structure of boride. Acknowledgements The authors would like to appreciate Prof. J. D. Xing and Dr. H. G. Fu for fruitful suggestions and also thank the financial support for this work from the National High-Tech R & D program under Contract NO. 2007AA03Z510 , P. R. China. References [1] T.C. Zhang D.Y. Li Mater. Sci. Eng. A 325 2002 87 97 [2] X. Wang D.Y. Li Mater. Sci. Eng. A 315 2001 158 165 [3] R. Liu D.Y. Li Wear 225–229 1999 968 974 [4] Z.L. Liu Y.X. Li X. Chen K.H. Hu Mater. Sci. Eng. A 486 2008 112 116 [5] W. Fairhurst K. Rohrig Foundry Trade J. 136 1974 685 698 [6] Z.H. Hu D.C. Luan Foundry Technol. 27 2006 153 155 [7] S. Seo S. Matsuoka T. Kanayama A. Yorifuji J. Iron Steel Inst. Jpn. 89 2003 593 600 [8] H.G. Fu Q. Xiao J.C. Kuang Z.Q. Jiang J.D. Xing Mater. Sci. Eng. A 466 2007 160 165 [9] H.G. Fu Z.H. Li J.Q. Jiang J.D. Xing Mater. Lett. 61 2007 4504 4507 [10] H.G. Fu Z.H. Li Y.P. Lei Z.Q. Jiang J.D. Xing Mater. Des. 30 2009 885 891 [11] K. Peev M. Radulovic M. Fiset J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 13 1994 112 114 [12] M. Radulovic M. Fiset K. Peev M. Tomovic J. Mater. Sci. 29 1994 5085 5094 [13] M. Fiset K. Peev M. Radulovic J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 12 1993 615 617 [14] C.Q. Guo C.D. Wang X.P. Liu P.M. Kelly China Foundry 5 2008 28 31 [15] E. Ya. Gol’dshtein V.G. Mizin Met. Sci. Heat Treat. 30 1988 479 484 [16] H. Baker ASM Handbook: Alloy Phase Diagram [M] tenth ed. 1990 ASM, International Handbook Committee Materials Park, OH [17] A.S. Chaus F.I. Rudnitskii Met. Sci. Heat Treat. 31 1989 121 128 [18] A.S. Chaus Met. Sci. Heat Treat. 47 2005 53 61 [19] A.R. Khodabandeh M. Jahazi S. Yue S.T. Aghdashi Mater. Manuf. Process. 21 2006 105 110 [20] A.R. Khodabandeh M. Jahazi S. Yue P. Bocher ISIJ Int. 45 2005 272 280 [21] C.Q. Guo P.M. Kelly Mater. Sci. Eng. A 352 2003 40 45 [22] W.D. Wang S.H. Zhang X.L. He Acta Metall. 43 1995 1693 1699 [23] S.G. Cook J.E. King J.A. Little Mater. Sci. Technol. 11 1995 1093 1098 [24] A.H. Ucisik C. Bindal Surf. Coat. Technol. 94–95 1997 561 565 [25] U. Sen S. Sen S. Koksal F. Yilmaz Mater. Des. 26 2005 175 179 [26] S. Sen I. Ozbek U. Sen C. Bindal Surf. Coat. Technol. 135 2001 173 177 [27] B.R. Lawn E.R. Fuller J. Mater. Sci. 10 1997 2016 2024 [28] B.A. Cook A.M. Russell J.L. Harringa A.J. Slager M.T. Rohe J. Alloys Compd. 366 2004 145 151 [29] I. Campos R. Rosas U. Figueroa C. VillaVelázquez A. Meneses A. Guevara Mater. Sci. Eng. A 488 2008 562 568 [30] N. Frantzevich F.F. Voronov S.A. Bakuta Elastic Constants and Elastic Modulus for Metals and Nonmetals: Handbook 1982 Naukova Dumka Press Kiev [31] V.I. Dybkov J. Mater. Sci. 42 2007 6614 6627 [32] X.H. Zhi J.D. Xing Y.M. Gao Mater. Sci. Eng. A 487 2008 171 179 [33] R. Benz J.F. Elliott J. Chipman Metall. Mater. Trans. B 5 1974 2235 2240 [34] V.I. Dybkov W. Lengauer K. Barmak J. Alloys Compd. 398 2005 113 122 [35] V.I. Dybkov W. Lengauer P. Gas J. Mater. Sci. 41 2006 4948 4960 [36] M. Carbucicchio G. Palmobarini M. Rateo G. Sambogna Hyperfine Interact. 116 1998 143 148 [37] P. Christodoulou N. Calos Mater. Sci. Eng. A 301 2001 103 117 [38] V.I. Dybkov L.V. Goncharuk V.G. Khoruzha K.A. Meleshevich A.V. Samelyuk V.R. Sidorko Solid State Phenom. 138 2008 181 188 [39] H.W. Jin C.G. Park M.C. Kim Mater. Sci. Eng. A 304–306 2001 321 326 [40] H.W. Jin Y.M. Rhyim S.G. Hong C.G. Park Mater. Sci. Eng. A 304–306 2001 1069 1074 [41] H.W. Jin C.G. Park M.C. Kim Surf. Coat. Technol. 113 1999 103 112 [42] N.J. Calos E. Graham D.R. Cousens P. Christodoulou C.H.L. Kennard L.K. Bekessy Mater. Trans. 42 2001 496 501 [43] S.H. Zhang X.L. He T. Ko J. Mater. Sci. 29 1994 2655 2662 [44] M. Jahazi J.J. Jonas Mater. Sci. Eng. A 335 2002 49 61 [45] X. Huang M.C. Chaturvedi N.L. Richards J. Jackman Acta Mater. 45 1997 3095 3107 [46] C. Bindal A. Hikmet Ucisik Surf. Coat. Technol. 122 1999 208 213 [47] M.S. Li S.L. Fu W.D. Xu R.L. Zhang R.H. Yu Acta Metall. Sin. 31 1995 201 207
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
-
Effects of Chromium on the Morphology and Mechanical Properties of Fe2B Intermetallic in Fe-3.0B Alloy
Yongxin Jian,Zhifu Huang,Jiandong Xing,Yimin Gao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-1936-2
IF: 4.5
2018-01-01
Journal of Materials Science
Abstract:In this work, the effects of chromium addition on the morphology and mechanical properties of Fe2B in Fe-3.0B alloy have been systematically investigated by a combination of experimental observations and the first-principles calculations. The results indicate that, with chromium addition in Fe-3.0B alloy ranging from 0 to 2.5 wt%, the average grain size of the boride firstly decreases and then increases slightly, mainly attributed to the volume fraction of coarse block boride. The nanoindentation hardness H of the boride remains almost constant while the elastic modulus E r firstly drops and then rises. Accordingly, the H/E r of the boride achieves a peak value at the chromium addition of 2.0 wt%, where the highest toughness is obtained. High-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) observation demonstrates that the lattice of borides evolves from tetragonal to orthorhombic ((Fe, Cr)2B) after chromium addition, in good accordance with the calculation results. During the lattice evolution, a shrinkage of B–B bond along [002] direction is simultaneously revealed. The inherently weak B–B bond can be strengthened, which improves fracture toughness of Fe2B.
-
Microstructure and Crystallography of Borides and Mechanical Properties of Fe–B–C–Cr–Al Alloys
Zheng Lv,Hanguang Fu,Jiandong Xing,Shengqiang Ma,Ying Hu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.11.171
IF: 6.2
2015-01-01
Journal of Alloys and Compounds
Abstract:The solidification microstructure, crystallography of eutectic precipitations and mechanical properties of high boron steel with various aluminium and chromium concentrations have been investigated extensively in the present study, as the foundation of the further analysis about the corrosion and abrasion properties at elevated temperature. The experiment results indicate that the as-cast microstructures of test alloys mainly consist of a dendritic matrix with many interdendritic precipitations. The Fe-B binary alloy is mainly composed of ferrite, Fe2B and pearlite and the Fe-B-Al ternary alloy consists of alpha-(Fe, Al) solid solution, Fe2B and Fe3AlC0.5. When aluminium and chromium elements are added synchronously, the as-cast microstructure changes to alpha-(Fe, Al, Cr) solid solution, (Fe, Cr)(2)B boride, M-7(C, B)(3) and M-23(C, B)(6) borocarbides. Moreover, the nucleation and growth of M-7(C, B)(3) borocarbide is adhere to (Fe, Cr)(2)B boride because of an interphase match between crystal plane (101(-) 0) of M-7(C, B)(3) and (010) of Cr-rich (Fe, Cr)(2)B. Alloy Fe-1.46 wt. % B-0.22 wt. % C-11.92wt. % Cr-8.73 wt. % Al shows the highest impact toughness value. The main fracture mode is brittle fracture of boride and tough fracture of matrix. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
-
Improving Fracture Toughness and Hardness of Fe2B in High Boron White Cast Iron by Chromium Addition
Zhifu Huang,Jiandong Xing,Cheng Guo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2010.01.003
2010-01-01
Abstract:The effect of chromium containing 0%, 0.49%, 1.02%, 2.1%, 3.2% (in wt.%) on the morphology, fracture toughness and micro-hardness property of Fe2B in high boron white cast iron was investigated. The results indicated that, with an increase of chromium addition, the morphology of Fe2B becomes larger and changes from the block to rod shape, its micro-hardness increases and the fracture toughness increases first and then decreases. Compared with the fracture toughness (3.8MPam1/2) of Fe2B without chromium addition, the toughness at 2.1wt.% chromium addition can be improved by above one time, achieving 7.8Mpam1/2, and the result was also qualitatively testified by the micro-cracks in Fe2B based on scanning electron microscope micrographs.
-
Effect of improving Fe2B toughness by chromium addition on the two-body abrasive wear behavior of Fe–3.0 wt% B cast alloy
Yongxin Jian,Zhifu Huang,Jiandong Xing,Baochao Zheng,Liang Sun,Yangzhen Liu,Yanmei Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2016.05.009
IF: 5.62
2016-01-01
Tribology International
Abstract:Effects of chromium addition on microstructure, two-body abrasive wear behavior of Fe–B cast alloy and fracture toughness of boride were investigated. The results indicate the solidification microstructure of Fe–3.0wt% B alloy consists of ferrite, pearlite and eutectic boride. After quenching, the alloy microstructure is composed of martensite and boride. With Cr addition increasing, microhardness of matrix and boride has tiny fluctuation; fracture toughness of M2B increases first reaching the maximum (4.704MPam1/2) at 2.0wt% and then decreases; two-body wear resistance increases first and then decreases under contact loads of 15N, 35N and 55N, possessing similar variation trend with fracture toughness of M2B. This indicates the toughness of M2B has directly positive influence on wear resistance of Fe–3.0wt% B cast alloy.
-
Effect of Boron Concentration on the Solidification Microstructure and Properties of Fe‐Cr‐B Alloy
H. Zhang,H. Fu,Y. Jiang,H. Guo,Y. Lei,R. Zhou,Q. Cen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mawe.201100753
2011-01-01
Materialwissenschaft und Werkstofftechnik
Abstract:In this article, the effect of boron concentration (B = 0, 0.4, 0.8, 1.4 and 2.0 respectively) on the solidification microstructure and properties of Fe-Cr-B alloy containing 0.35% C, 10-12% Cr, 0.5-0.8% Si, and 0.7-1.0% Mn was studied by means of the optical microscope (OM), the scanning electron microscope (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), Rockwell hardness and Vickers hardness tester. The results indicate that the microstructure of boron-free sample consists of the martensite, and its hardness reaches 59.2 HRC. When a small amount of boron element was added, the eutectic phase of network structure generated along the grain boundary. The amount of eutectic phase increases when the boron concentration increases. Moreover, the eutectic phase is the mixture of boride and boron carbide. The boride is Fe(2)B and the boron carbide is (Cr, Fe)(7)(C, B)(3). Compared with boron-free sample, the Rockwell hardness of the samples with different boron concentrations are all higher, above 62 HRC, and the hardness grow up with the increase of boron concentration. When the boron concentration reaches to 1.4%, the Rockwell hardness of the alloy is 65.7 HRC, which is the highest in this study. When the boron concentration rises to 2.0%, the hardness has no obvious change.
-
Investigation on two-body abrasive wear behavior and mechanism of Fe–3.0 wt% B cast alloy with different chromium content
Yongxin Jian,Zhifu Huang,Jiandong Xing,Xiaoting Liu,Liang Sun,Baochao Zheng,Yong Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2016.04.029
IF: 4.695
2016-09-01
Wear
Abstract:Effect of chromium content on two-body wear behavior of Fe–3.0wt% B cast alloy was investigated. The wear mechanism with different abrasive, associating with Fe2B toughness, was discussed in the present study. The results indicate, solidification microstructures of the alloy are composed of ferrite, pearlite and eutectic boride, and the heat treated microstructures comprise of martensite and eutectic boride. With chromium content increasing, chromium concentration in boride is 3.82 times higher than that in matrix; microhardness of boride and hardness of the alloy change little, while toughness of boride increases first and then decreases. During two-body wear test, wear weight losses with SiC abrasive are generally higher than those with SiO2 abrasive. With Cr content increasing in the alloy, on condition of SiO2 abrasive, the wear resistance increases first and then decreases, possessing the same trend as the toughness of boride; with SiC abrasive, wear resistance changes in a way similar to that with SiO2 abrasive, except that wear resistance under contact load of 55N increases sharply and then keeps nearly constant. Wear results show that toughness of boride is the main factor to influence wear resistance of Fe–3.0wt% B cast alloy.
engineering, mechanical,materials science, multidisciplinary
-
Solidification Process, Microstructure, and Mechanical Properties of Cr-doped High Boron Fe-based Alloy
Yongxin Jian,Zhifu Huang,Yu Wang,Tonghai Wu,Jiandong Xing
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2021.124592
IF: 4.778
2021-01-01
Materials Chemistry and Physics
Abstract:High boron Fe-based alloys, possessing superior wear-resistant performance, have always been restricted to be applied in impacting conditions by the poor toughness. In the present work, Fe-3.0B-0.3C alloy has been toughened by introducing Cr element. The evolutions of the solidification process, microstructure and the mechanical properties have been systematically investigated by means of the scanning electron microscope (SEM), transmission electron microscope (TEM), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and nano-indentation. The experimental results show that Cr addition affects the solidification process so as to result in the microstructure evolution of Fe2B hard phase. Cr atoms are inclined to aggregate in Fe2B grain to improve its toughness without sacrificing the hardness. The optimal fracture toughness of Fe-3.0B-0.3C alloy can be improved by nearly 38.5%. Through the analysis of crack's propagation and fractography, the toughening mechanisms have been revealed to be the coupling actions of the improved toughness and microstructure evolution of Fe2B hard phase.
-
Effects of Chromium Addition on Corrosion Resistance of Fe–3.5B Alloy in Liquid Zinc
Shengqiang Ma,Jiandong Xing,Dawei Yi,Hanguang Fu,Jianjun Zhang,Yefei Li,Zhiyun Zhang,Guofeng Liu,Baojian Zhu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2011.04.101
2011-01-01
Abstract:The effects of chromium addition on the corrosion resistance of Fe–3.5B alloy in liquid zinc bath at 520°C have been investigated. The results show that the matrix of as-cast Fe–3.5B alloy transforms into α-(Fe, Cr) solid solution while the eutectic Fe2B changes into M2B-type boride gradually with the increasing chromium addition. The corrosion resistance of Fe–3.5B alloy can be greatly enhanced by 5wt.% chromium addition that still maintains the netlike structure of boride in it. EDX analysis reveals that the Cr element can enrich in the Γ-Fe3Zn10Crx (x=1.09 to 1.37) phase of the interface to hinder the diffusion of zinc atoms favorably. The Cr addition has no effect on the Vickers hardness of δ and ζ in the corrosion layer basically. Corrosion mechanism of Fe–3.5B alloys with various Cr additions includes the following processes: the superficial dissolution of Cr at the interface, dissolution of the Cr-depleted zones of the matrix corroded by liquid zinc, and the spalling of boride which lost the supporting role of the matrix completely. The corrosion process is mainly controlled by the diffusion of liquid zinc atoms.
-
Effect of Chromium on Microstructure and Properties of High Boron White Cast Iron
Zhongli Liu,Xiang Chen,Yanxiang Li,Kaihua Hu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-007-9385-1
2008-01-01
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A
Abstract:In this article, the effect of chromium on microstructure and properties of high boron white cast iron was studied. The results indicate that the microstructure of high boron white cast iron with different chromium content comprises a dendritic matrix and interdendritic eutectics, and the eutectic compound has a M2B-type chemical formula that does not change with the difference of chromium content. The increase of chromium not only increases the microhardness of boride, but also improves the morphology of boride, which is changed from continuous network to less continuous distribution. Moreover, with the chromium increase, martensite appears in the matrix under the as-cast condition, the appearance of which depends on the increase of chromium in the matrix and the uneven distribution of carbon in the matrix caused by chromium addition. After quenching in air, the matrixes of alloys all change to martensite. However, some secondary particles are found in the central area of the dendrite grains of alloys with higher chromium, and their existence is due to the difference of boron solubility in the matrix with different chromium content. In addition, the hardenability, hardness, and impact toughness are all improved with the increase in chromium.
-
Effects of Chromium Addition on Microstructure and Abrasion Resistance of Fe–B Cast Alloy
Jianjun Zhang,Yimin Gao,Jiandong Xing,Shengqiang Ma,Dawei Yi,Jingbo Yan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-011-9823-5
2011-01-01
Abstract:This research work studies the effects of chromium on microstructure and abrasion resistance of Fe–B cast alloy. The results show that eutectic boride changes from continuous network to less continuous and matrix changes from pearlite to martensite with the increase in chromium content in the alloy. Meanwhile, an increase in chromium addition in the alloy leads to an increase in the chromium content in M2B-type boride because chromium can enter boride by substituting for iron in Fe2B. Under two-body wear, Fe–B cast alloy exhibits excellent wear resistance. When alloys are tested against soft abrasive, chromium can markedly improve the wear resistance of Fe–B cast alloy, whereas excessive chromium can reduce the wear resistance. The wear resistance of Fe–B cast alloy increases first and then decreases with the increase in chromium. But when tested against hard abrasive, since the hardness of SiC is much higher than that of M2B boride, an increase in chromium content marginally increases the wear resistance. Weight losses of Fe–B cast alloy increase with the increase in the load and exhibit the linear relationship.
-
Effect of boron concentration on microstructures and properties of Fe–B–C alloy steel
Xiangyi Ren,Hanguang Fu,Jiandong Xing,Yongwei Yang,Shuli Tang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2017.304
IF: 2.7
2017-01-01
Journal of Materials Research
Abstract:The solidification microstructure, types of eutectic borocarbides, heat treatment properties and wear resistance of steel with x wt% B–0.4 wt% C–6.0 wt% Cr–4.0 wt% Mo–1.0 wt% Al–1.0 wt% Si–1.0 wt% V–0.5 wt% Mn ( x = 1.0, 2.0, 3.0) have been investigated in this present study. The results indicate that the as-cast Fe–B–C alloy steel consists of pearlite, ferrite, and borocarbides M 2 (B,C) (M = Fe, Cr, Mo, V, Mn). After quenching or quenching and tempering treatment, ferrite and pearlite transform into martensite. With the increase of boron content, the macrohardness of alloys increases obviously while wear loss decreases. Borocarbides with chromium addition have good toughness and no cracks are observed on worn surfaces. The wear mechanism changes from micro-cutting accompanied with the spalling of borocarbides to single micro-cutting with the boron content rising.
-
Effect of Chromium Content on Microstructure, Hardness, and Wear Resistance of As-Cast Fe-Cr-B Alloy
Ye Tian,Jiang Ju,Hanguang Fu,Shengqiang Ma,Jian Lin,Yongping Lei
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-019-04369-5
IF: 2.3
2019-10-01
Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance
Abstract:The effects of chromium content on microstructure, hardness and wear resistance of as-cast Fe-xCr-1.0B (x = 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20) alloys were investigated by means of optical microscope (OM), scanning electron microscope (SEM), x-ray diffractometer (XRD), hardness tester and ring block wear tester. The results showed that the microstructures of chromium-free alloy were mainly composed of pearlite, ferrite, and eutectic borocarbides, and the hardness was very low, only 18.8 HRC. With the increase in chromium content, the matrix of as-cast Fe-Cr-B alloy gradually began to transform from pearlite and ferrite to lath martensite, and the type of borocarbides changed from Fe2(B, C) to M2(B, C), M7(C, B)3 and M23(C, B)6 (M = Fe, Cr). When the chromium content was 12 wt.%, the hardness of alloy reached the highest value of 61.1 HRC, and the wear resistance of alloy was the best. The results of worn surface analysis showed that the wear failure of as-cast Fe-Cr-B alloy was mainly caused by multiple plastic deformation and micro-cutting.
materials science, multidisciplinary
-
Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of High Boron White Cast Iron with about 4 Wt% Chromium
Xiang Chen,Yanxiang Li,Huiming Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-010-4840-6
IF: 4.5
2010-01-01
Journal of Materials Science
Abstract:The microstructure and mechanical properties of high boron white cast irons with about 4 wt% chromium before and after treating with rare earth magnesium alloy were studied in this article. The experimental results indicate that the cast irons comprise a dendritic matrix and interdendritic eutectic borides M2B and M′0.9Cr1.1B0.9 that distributed in the form of continuous network in as-cast condition. The matrix is made up of fine pearlite in the alloys with and without modification, but the grain size of the matrix is decreased greatly after modification. After water quenching at 1,303 K and tempering at 473 K, the matrix of the alloy mostly changes to lath-type martensite. For the alloy without modification the boride morphology remains almost unchanged after heat treatment. And a secondary precipitation of M23(C,B)6 compound appears in the central region of dentritic matrix grains. The morphology of the eutectic borides is changed to the form of isolated blocks after heat treatment and there is only little intragranular M23(B,C)6 particles in the matrix are found in the alloy modified with rare earth magnesium alloy. The modification by rare earth magnesium alloy can refine the primary austenite and the eutectic borides. Combined with a high austenitizing temperature the modification can improve the morphology of the borides which results in the improvement of toughness and tensile strength.
-
Effect of Heat Treatment on Microstructure and Property of Fe‐Cr‐B Alloy
H. Zhang,H. Fu,Y. Jiang,Z. Yu,H. Guo,Y. Lei,R. Zhou,Q. Cen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mawe.201200939
2012-01-01
Materialwissenschaft und Werkstofftechnik
Abstract:In this article, the effect of heat treatment in different quenching temperature on microstructure and hardness of Fe-Cr-B alloy was studied, by contrast with boron-free Fe-Cr alloy. The results indicated that microstructure of boron-free Fe-Cr alloy consisted of the martensite and a few (Cr, Fe)7C3 type carbide. The microstructures had no obvious change with the increase of quenching temperature, but its hardness increased from 51.5 HRC to 60.8 HRC. When boron element was added into the Fe-Cr alloy, the netlike eutectic structure began to break and spheroidizing after quenching, in which the borocarbide turned into spherical groups and network Fe2B phase was broken. Moreover, the portion of martensite increased, and the amount of secondary carbide decreased, and the size of secondary carbide began to largen after quenching. When the quenching temperature reached 1100 degrees C, secondary carbide particles dissolved in the matrix wholly. The hardness of Fe-Cr-B alloy increased with the increase of quenching temperature below 1050 degrees C. The hardness of sample containing 2.0% B and quenching at 1050 degrees C reached 66.7 HRC. The hardness of Fe-Cr-B alloy had no obvious change when quenching temperature continued to increase. After tempered at 200 degrees C, the microstructure of Fe-Cr-B alloy had no significant change and its hardness had slight decrease. The hardness of sample containing 2.0% B tempered at 200 degrees C reached 63.9 HRC.
-
Microstructure and Properties of Casting Fe–Cr–B Alloy After Quenching Treatment
Tian Ye,Fu Hanguang,Lin Jian,Guo Xingye,Lei Yongping
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-019-01661-9
2019-04-05
Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals
Abstract:The as-cast microstructure of Fe–4Cr–B alloy has been systematically investigated, which contains 1 wt%B, 4 wt%Cr, 0.35 wt%C, 0.8 wt%Si and 0.8 wt%Mn. The investigation was carried out by optical microscopy (OM), scanning electron microscopy (EDS/SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), hardness tester and wear tester, and the quenching temperature effect on its microstructure and mechanical property was studied. The results showed that ferrite, pearlite, martensite and borocarbides were the main composition of the solidification microstructure of casting Fe–4Cr–B alloy. After water quenching at 950–1150 °C, the matrix transformed to martensite, and the secondary borocarbides M<sub>23</sub> (C, B)<sub>6</sub> precipitated from the matrix, and then the continuous distribution of M<sub>2</sub> (B, C) (M = Fe, Cr, Mn) among dendrites began to break. As the water quenching temperature increased, the phenomenon of disconnection became more clearly. When the water quenching temperature was 1100 °C, the network borocarbides fractured and formed an isolated distribution. The hardness of the alloy increased first and then decreased. At water quenching temperature of 1100 °C, the hardness reached the maximum of 62.8 HRC. The abrasive resistance and hardness of casting Fe–4Cr–B alloy changed at the same trend.
metallurgy & metallurgical engineering
-
Effect of Chromium-Induced (fe, Cr)3C Toughness Improvement on the Two-Body Abrasive Wear Behaviors of White Cast Iron
Baochao Zheng,Jiandong Xing,Wei Li,Xiaohui Tu,Yongxin Jian
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2020.203363
IF: 4.695
2020-01-01
Wear
Abstract:An as-cast chromium white cast iron alloy with chromium (Cr) content of 0 wt%, 1 wt%, 2 wt%, 3 wt%, and 4 wt % was prepared via metallurgical smelting and casting processes. The effects of Cr content on the toughness, hardness, and microstructure of (Fe, Cr)(3)C carbides was evaluated. The results revealed that the microstructure of the as-cast alloys is mainly composed of bulk carbide and the pearlite matrix. The carbide in the alloy without added Cr, i.e., eutectic Fe3C, was characterized by a continuous network structure. With the addition of Cr atoms, the Fe3C-type carbide was transformed into (Fe, Cr)(3)C, leading to a gradual increase in the fracture toughness of the carbide. This may have resulted from the incorporation of Cr into Fe3C and the consequent crystal-structure transformation of the carbide. When the Cr content of the carbide was lower than the saturation level (<2 wt%), the microhardness of the carbide in the as-cast alloy increased significantly. This resulted from an increase in the number of strong (Fe-Cr) metallic bonds in the carbide. However, for Cr content exceeding 2 wt%, the microhardness increased only slightly. Changes in the mechanical properties of the carbides resulted in improved wear resistance of the materials and changes in the wear mechanism of the carbides. At low Cr content, the wear failure of the carbide was characterized mainly by brittle fracture and peeling. With improvement in the toughening performance, microcutting became the main wear failure mechanism of the carbides and exerted a significant blocking effect on the silicon oxide abrasive.
-
Effect of boron on microstructure evolution and properties of wear-resistant cast Fe–Si–Mn–Cr–B alloy
Zhang Changle,Li Shouhai,Lin Yinghua,Ju Jiang,Fu Hanguang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.03.081
IF: 6.267
2020-05-01
Journal of Materials Research and Technology
Abstract:<p>The purpose of this study was to clarify the effect of boron content on the microstructure evolution, mechanical properties, and three-body abrasive wear property of as-cast Fe–Si–Mn–Cr–B alloys, and to reveal the wear mechanism of Fe–Si–Mn–Cr–B alloys. The results indicated that the microstructure of the Fe–Si–Mn–Cr–B alloy was mainly composed of bainite, retained austenite (RA), M<sub>3</sub>B<sub>2</sub>, and M<sub>2</sub>B (M stands for the metal atom, in this case, it refers to Fe, Cr, and Mn). With the increase of boron content, the volume fraction of the boride phase increased, the morphology of the boride phase was dominated by fishbone, the microhardness of the boride phase and the macrohardness of the alloy increased, and the wear resistance of the alloy was significantly enhanced. Compared with the 0.5 wt.% B alloy, the macrohardness of the 2.0 wt.% B alloy was increased by 19.5%, the maximum microhardness of the boride phase reached 1440 HV<sub>0.2</sub>, the Charpy impact toughness was reduced by 45%, and the wear resistance was increased by 268%. The morphology, content and distribution of the boride phase play a key role in improving the hardness and wear resistance of the alloy. The synergy between the high-hardness boride phase and the softer metal matrix phase, which was composed of bainite and RA, gave the alloy excellent wear resistance. The main wear mechanisms of the alloy were abrasive wear and fretting wear.</p>
-
Effect of chromium content on microstructure and mechanical properties of Fe-C-B hypoeutectic alloys
邓培凯,黎振华,岑启宏,刘美红
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13289/j.issn.1009-6264.2013.12.012
2013-01-01
Abstract:In order to investigate the effect of chromium content(Cr≤3.80%) on microstructure and properties of Fe-C-B hypoeutectic alloys, the microstructure of the alloys was observed by optical microscopy(OM), quantitative metallography analysis and X-ray diffraction(XRD), their hardness and impact toughness were analyzed and tested. The results show that chromium can accelerate precipitation of primary austenite and pearlitic transformation of the alloy, decrease volume of eutectic ledeburite and eutectic hard-phase, and improve the distribution of hard-phases. The impact toughness of as-cast and heat-treated alloys improves with increasing of chromium content. However, the hardness of the alloys firstly increases and then decreases with the increasing chromium, and it reaches the maximum when Cr content is 3.23% in present experiment. The impact toughness of the sample containing 3.80% Cr increases by about 50% compared with that of the sample without chromium.
-
Balance between strength and ductility of dilute Fe2B by high-throughput first-principles calculations
Guangchi Wang,Yehua Jiang,Zulai Li,Xiaoyu Chong,Jing Feng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.10.045
IF: 5.532
2021-02-01
Ceramics International
Abstract:In boride ceramics, Fe2B typically functions as the primary wear-resistant phase owing to its high hardness, but the elastic and ductile-brittle properties of Fe2B greatly influence its wear resistance and industrial application. First-principles calculations using density functional theory (DFT) were utilized to systematically investigate the effects of Al, Si, and transition elements (including 3d, 4d, and 5d transition elements) on the mechanical properties and electronic structure of Fe31MB16 with a dilute solution model. The bulk modulus (B), shear modulus (G), and Young's modulus (E) were calculated through the stress-strain method. The Vickers hardness (H V ) and fracture toughness (K IC ) were calculated by semi-empirical models. The electronic structures and chemical bonding were analyzed using the charge density difference, electron localization function, and Mulliken bond population. Overall, Fe31YB16 had the largest moduli (B, G, and E) among all the Fe31MB16 compounds that were investigated, while Fe31CrB16 had the highest hardness. Compared with pure Fe2B, the ductility of Fe31MB16 improved to varying degrees according to the B/G and Poisson's ratio (σ) criteria, respectively. However, adding alloying elements in this concentration did not change the intrinsic brittleness of Fe2B. Moreover, the trends in the calculated K IC of Fe31MB16 (M = Cr, Mn, Mo, and W respectively) were consistent with those of experiments. The electronic structure and Mulliken population analysis showed that the differences in the mechanical properties of the Fe31MB16 compounds were primarily determined by the M-B and B–B bonds because the alloying element M replaced Fe. These results provide guidance for improving the ductility of Fe2B and its industrial application.
materials science, ceramics
-
Effect of Heat Treatment on Structure and Wear Resistance of High Chromium Cast Steel Containing Boron
Qi-hong Cen,Hi-bin Zhang,Han-guang Fu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s1006-706x(14)60083-2
2014-01-01
Abstract:The microstructure, mechanical properties and wear resistance of high chromium cast steel containing boron after different heat treatments were studied by means of the optical microscopy (OM), the scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), hardness, impact toughness, tensile and pin-on-disc abrasion tests. The results show that as-cast microstructures of boron-free high chromium steel consist of martensite and a few (Cr, Fe)7C3 carbide, and the macro-hardness of boron-free high chromium steel is 55–57 HRC. After 0.5 mass% B was added into high chromium cast steel, as-cast structure transforms into eutectic (Fe,Cr)2B, (Cr,Fe)7 (C,B)3 and martensite, and the macro-hardness reaches 58–60 HRC. High temperature quenching leads to the disconnection and isolated distribution of boride, and there are many (CrFe)23 (CB)6 precipitated phases in the quenching structure. Quenching from 1050 °C, high chromium steel obtained the highest hardness, and the hardness of high chromium cast steel containing boron is higher than that of boron-free high chromium steel. The change of quenching temperature has no obvious effect on impact toughness of high chromium steel, and the increase of quenching temperature leads to tensile strength having an increasing tendency. At the same quenching temperature, the wear resistance of hgh chromium cast steel containing boron is more excellent than that of boron-free high chromium steel. High chromium cast steel guide containing boron has good performance while using in steel bar mill.