Interpretation of and Critique to Hegemonic Operation of Modern Politics ——From Laclau's Hegemonic Logic to Zizek's Criticism Based on Negativity

KONG Ming-an

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.0257-2826.2013.01.004

2013-01-01

Abstract:The operation of modern political hegemony is an important concern of Laclau,Mouffe and Zizek.The key aspects of this issue are the three particularity and universality of political hegemony during its formation process.Laclau's political hegemonic logic is based on the term "empty signifier".Empty signifier,floating signifier and heterogeneity are the three key concepts of his political hegemonic logic.It is based on the heterogeneity concept that Laclau defined his political hegemonic logic as a mixture of empiric and priori.Zizek,who is another representative of post-Marxism,disagrees with Laclau's hegemonic logic and considers it a variant of post-modernism.Zizek points out that Laclau's hegemonic logic is in essence operation of political hegemony without touching the economic and political systems of modern capitalism,and thus falls into a trap of insuperable problems.He says that this has turned Laclau's hegemonic logic into a kind of quasi-Kantianism that combines transcendental logic and practical politics.The debate between Laclu and Zizek over universality and particularity of political hegemony will contribute to researches of post-Marxism and modern political philosophy.