Recovery of lower limb function in elder patients with intertrochanteric fractures treated with hip joint replacement versus dynamic hip screw
Xiao-qiang Huang,Yong-hua Liao,Xiao-dong Wang,Xin-min Wang,Si-hai Gong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1673-8225.2006.04.013
2006-01-01
Abstract:Aim: To comparatively observe the clinical effects of hip joint replacement and dynamic hip screws (DHS) in treating senile intertrochanteric fractures, and evaluate the effect of hip joint replacement in treating senile intertrochanteric fractures. Methods: From September 1999 to June 2004, 156 elderly patients with intertrochanteric fracture (93 males and 63 females) with an average age of 72.7 years ranged from 65 to 87 years, were treated with DHS or hip joint replacement. The fracture was on the left in 102 cases and on the right in 49 cases. The types of fracture were Evans-Jensen type I in 49 cases, type II in 64 cases and type III in 43 cases. The patients were randomly divided into hip joint replacement group (n=76) and DHS group (n=80). The general information, operative duration, intraoperative blood loss, total volume of blood transfusion, complications, walking time and function of affected limb were statistically analyzed in the two groups. Results: A total of 156 patients participated in the study, 1 case in the hip joint replacement group and 2 cases in the DHS group lost to the follow-up, all the other patients received the radiography and clinical follow-up, the follow-up rate was 98.1%. During the follow-up, 1 case died from cerebrovascular accident and 1 case died of myocardial infarction in the hip joint replacement group; 1 case died of hypostatic pneumonia, 1 case died of cerebrovascular accident and 1 case died from unknown reason in the DHS group. The intraoperative blood loss and total volume of blood transfusion had no significant difference between the two groups, but the postoperative complications, walking time and function of affected limb (excellent rate) were significantly different [4, 12 cases; (8.6±3.6), (73.6±11.8) days; 89.5%, 77.5%, P < 0.05]. The hirris score of hip joint at final follow-up was significantly different between the hip joint replacement group and DHS group [(84.6±7.4), (81.3±5.6), P < 0.05]. Conclusion: Hip joint replacement in treating senile intertrochanteric fractures has the excellence of short time in bed, quick healing and fewer complications. It is worth to be introduced.