Curative effect of biofeedback electrical stimulation on the treatment of pelvic floor functional rehabilitation after total abdominal hysterectomy
Guanglin Guo,Li Hong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2016.04.011
2016-01-01
Abstract:Objective To explore the curative effect of biofeedback electrical stimulation on pelvic floor functional rehabilitation after total abdominal hysterectomy . Methods A total of 90 patients after total abdominal hysterectomy in the Gynecology and Obstetrics Department of Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University from January 1 to December 31 in 2013 were chosen as study objects . According to admission odd and even numbers ,they were divided into experimental group and control group ,and 45 patients in each group .The patients in experimental group were treated by biofeedback electrical stimulation and pelvic floor muscles training ,while patients in control group were treated only by pelvic floor muscles training .After 3 months and 6 months of total abdominal hysterectomy , pelvic floor muscle strength levels , vaginal pressures , degrees of staging pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP‐Q) ,degrees of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and overall sexual satisfaction rates were compared between two groups statistically .There were no significant differences between two groups of patients in general clinical data including age ,mode of delivery and body mass index etc . (P> 0 .05) .This study followed the procedures in line with Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University Ethics Committee to develop human trials of the standard ,approved by the committee ,and all the patients signed the informed consents .Results ① There were no significant differences between two groups of patients in pelvic floor muscle tension levels ,vaginal resting and squeeze pressures ,durations of vaginal contraction ,and SUI degrees after 3 months of total abdominal hysterectomy (P> 0 .05) .② After 6 months of total abdominal hysterectomy ,the pelvic floor muscle strength levels and SUI degrees of patients in experimental group were better than those of control group (Z= -5 .220 ,P=0.000 ;Z=6 .429 ,P=0 .011) ,vaginal resting and squeeze pressures were higher than those of control group[(31 .9 ± 7 .2) cmH2 O vs (23 .8 ± 7 .0) cmH2 O ,t= -4 .312 ,P=0.000;(34 .6 ± 9 .4) cmH2 O vs (25 .1 ± 9 .6) cmH2O ,t= -4 .210 ,P= 0 .000](1 cmH2O = 0 .098 1 kPa) ,duration of vaginal contraction was longer than that of control group[(4 .2 ± 1 .1) s vs (2 .7 ± 1 .8) s ,t= -4 .045 ,P=0.000] ,overall sexual satisfaction rate was higher than that of control group (86 .7% vs 60 .0% ,χ2 =8.182 ,P= 0 .004) ,and all the differences above were statistically significant (P< 0 .05) .③ There were no significant differences between two groups of patients in POP‐Q extents after 3 and 6 months of total abdominal hysterectomy (P>0 .05) .Conclusions Biofeedback electrical stimulation for pelvic floor functional rehabilitation after total abdominal hysterectomy has significant effect , and can effectively prevent the pelvic floor dysfunction after hysterectomy .