Analysis on Adverse Drug Reaction Reports of Shanghai Oral Anti-Diabetic Drugs from 2006 to 2010

KE Jun,TANG Wenlu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.19577/j.cnki.issn10074406.2011.06.008
2011-01-01
Abstract:AIM To study the feature and regularity of adverse drug reaction(ADR) induced by oral antidiabetic drugs and provide reasonable advice for clinical use.METHODS Collecting ADR reports from database of Shanghai ADR spontaneous reporting system from 2006 to 2010,using descriptive statistical methods and logistic regression model to make thorough analysis on the character of ADR induced by oral antidiabetic agents and discussing the impact of risk factors and drugs interaction on the ADR.RESULTS A total of 812 ADR reports induced by oral antidiabetic drugs were included in this study.Reports showed that the senior and female patients were mosdy concerned,and mainly marked as moderately injured,but new ADR reports marked as moderate and severe which were not recorded in drug in- structions and references increased significantly during the period 2009 to 2010,and most frequendy involved agents were biguanides,and sulfonylureas(SU).The logistic regression analysis of ADR induced by oral antidiabetic agents showed female,the high frequency of taking drug and single medication were risk factors of gastrointestinal damage,body weight was the risk factor of skin damage,and combined medication and patients' age were the risk factor of hypoglycemia caused by SU;the logistic regression model of the drug interaction showed the combined using of metformin and gliglide was prone to hypoglycemia and the combined using of metformin and glimepiride was prone to rash.CONCLUSION The ADR of oral antidiabetic drugs could involved multiple systems and organs,and the number of new ADR reports showes an upward trend in recent years.Gender,age,body weight,frequency of taking drug and combined medication have effects on the occurrence of ADR in different degree,so in order to take oral antidiabetic drugs safely and reasonably,we should strengthen the ADR monitoring and put emphasis on controlling the risk factors of ADR in clinical practice.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?