Management of cervical cerclage after preterm premature rupture of membranes

ZHANG Yan,ZHAO Yang-Yu,WANG Yan
2010-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To evaluate immediate versus delayed removal of cervical cerclage for women with preterm premature rupture of membranes with respect to maternal and neonatal outcomes.Methods:The authors retrospectively analyzed women with preterm premature rupture of membranes at 28~34 weeks' gestation with prior cervical cerclage placement.Timing of cervical cerclage removal,immediate(<24 hours) or delayed(>24 hours),was compared.Results:There were 43 women in the immediate-removal group and 55 in the delayed-removal group.Average times to removal were(4.1±0.8)h and(210.8±9.2)h respectively.Use of betamethasone,antenatal antibiotic and short-term tocolytic were similar for both groups;Duration of latency was significantly longer with delayed removal((266.5±6.9) hours vs.(109.5±8.7) hours,P<0.01).Delivery occurred <48 hours from preterm premature rupture of membranes in 5.5% versus 44.2%,P<0.01.And >7 days from rupture in 60%(33/55) versus 21%(9/43),P=0.03.Birth weight was statistically different.Rates of neonatal sepsis(at <10 days) and maternal infection were not statistically different.Neonatal outcomes did not significantly differ regarding mortality,respiratory distress syndrome,or duration of stay in the intensive care nursery.Conclusion:With the current management scheme for preterm premature rupture of membranes,cerclage retention significantly increases duration of latency and rate of maternal infection but not significantly alters neonatal outcomes.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?