Analysis of perinatal outcomes for emergency cervical cerclage in singleton pregnancies at 24–28 weeks of gestation
Xiling Yi,Dan Zhang,Jing Yang,Hongyan Gao,Hengyu Cai,Jianping Cong,Chengli Lin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-024-07493-3
2024-04-23
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
Abstract:Abstract Background Cervical cerclage is the only effective treatment for cervical insufficiency, effectively preventing late miscarriage and preterm birth. The effectiveness and safety of emergency cervical cerclage (ECC) as an emergency treatment when the cervix is already dilated or when there is protrusion of the fetal membranes into the vagina remain controversial, especially in pregnancies at 24–28 weeks when the fetus is viable. There is still no consensus on whether emergency cervical cerclage should be performed in such cases. Purpose To investigate the effectiveness and safety of emergency cervical cerclage in singleton pregnant women at 24–28 weeks of gestation. Methods This study employed a single-center prospective cohort design, enrolling singleton pregnant women at 24–28 weeks of gestation with ultrasound or physical examination indicating cervical dilation or even membrane protrusion. Emergency cervical cerclage was compared with conservative treatment. The primary endpoints included a comprehensive assessment of perinatal pregnancy loss, significant neonatal morbidity, and adverse neonatal outcomes. Secondary endpoints included prolonged gestational age, preterm birth, neonatal hospitalization rate, premature rupture of membranes, and intrauterine infection/chorioamnionitis. Results From June 2021 to March 2023, a total of 133 pregnant women participated in this study, with 125 completing the trial, and were allocated to either the Emergency Cervical Cerclage (ECC) group (72 cases) or the conservative treatment group (53 cases) based on informed consent from the pregnant women. The rate of adverse neonatal outcomes was 8.33% in the ECC group and 26.42% in the conservative treatment (CT) group, with a statistically significant difference ( P = 0.06). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of perinatal pregnancy loss and significant neonatal morbidity. The conservative treatment group had a mean prolonged gestational age of 63.0 (23.0, 79.5) days, while the ECC group had 84.0 (72.5, 89.0) days, with a statistically significant difference between the two groups ( P < 0.001). Compared with CT group, the ECC group showed a significantly reduced incidence of preterm birth before 28 weeks, 32 weeks, and 34 weeks, with statistical significance ( P = 0.046, 0.007, 0.001), as well as a significantly decreased neonatal hospitalization rate ( P = 0.013, 0.031). Additionally, ECC treatment did not increase the risk of preterm premature rupture of membranes or intrauterine infection/chorioamnionitis, with no statistically significant differences ( P = 0.406, 0.397). Conclusion In singleton pregnant women with cervical insufficiency at 24–28 weeks of gestation, emergency cervical cerclage can reduce adverse neonatal pregnancy outcomes, effectively prolong gestational age, decrease preterm births before 28 weeks, 32 weeks, and 34 weeks, lower neonatal hospitalization rates, and does not increase the risk of preterm premature rupture of membranes or intrauterine infection/chorioamnionitis.
obstetrics & gynecology