Abstract:Background The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) has become one of the most widely used measurement tools in child and adolescent mental health work across the globe. The SDQ was originally developed and validated within the UK and whilst its reliability and validity have been replicated in several countries important cross cultural issues have been raised. We describe normative data, reliability and validity of the Chinese translation of the SDQ (parent, teacher and self report versions) in a large group of children from Shanghai. Methods The SDQ was administered to the parents and teachers of students from 12 of Shanghai's 19 districts, aged between 3 and 17 years old, and to those young people aged between 11 and 17 years. Retest data was collected from parents and teachers for 45 students six weeks later. Data was analysed to describe normative scores, bandings and cut-offs for normal, borderline and abnormal scores. Reliability was assessed from analyses of internal consistency, inter-rater agreement, and temporal stability. Structural validity, convergent and discriminant validity were assessed. Results Full parent and teacher data was available for 1965 subjects and self report data for 690 subjects. Normative data for this Chinese urban population with bandings and cut-offs for borderline and abnormal scores are described. Principle components analysis indicates partial agreement with the original five factored subscale structure however this appears to hold more strongly for the Prosocial Behaviour, Hyperactivity – Inattention and Emotional Symptoms subscales than for Conduct Problems and Peer Problems. Internal consistency as measured by Cronbach's α coefficient were generally low ranging between 0.30 and 0.83 with only parent and teacher Hyperactivity – Inattention and teacher Prosocial Behaviour subscales having α > 0.7. Inter-rater correlations were similar to those reported previously (range 0.23 – 0.49) whilst test retest reliability was generally lower than would be expected (range 0.40 – 0.79). Convergent and discriminant validity are supported. Conclusion We report mixed findings with respect the psychometric properties of the Chinese translation of the SDQ. Reliability is a particular concern particularly for Peer Problems and self ratings by adolescents. There is good support for convergent validity but only partial support for structural validity. It may be possible to resolve some of these issues by carefully examining the wording and meaning of some of the current questions.

Reliability and validity of the Network of Relationship Inventory-Relationship Quality Version in Chinese teacher-student relationship

Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of Friendship Quality Inventory

Reliability and Validity of Short Version of the Experiences in Close Relationships Scale for Children in Chinese Middle School Students

Reliability and Validity Test of Chinese Version of the Experience of Close Relationship in Adolescents

Reversion of Preschool Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale in Chinese Preschoolers: Validity and Reliability

The Reliability and Validity of Chinese Translation of RSQ-SSV in Undergraduate Student

Can Parenting Styles and Dimensions Questionnaire (PSDQ) Be Used in China?

Reliabilities and Validities of Interpersonal Reactivity Index among Nursing Students

The Chinese version of the Pediatric Quality of Life InventoryTM Infant Scales (PedsQLTM 13-24 months): reliability and validity in healthy infants

The Validity, Reliability and Normative Scores of the Parent, Teacher and Self Report Versions of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in China.

The Chinese Version of Ruminative Responses Scale in High School Students:Its Reliability and Validity

Study of Reliability and Validity of Chinese Version of Antidepressants Compliance Question-naire

The Reliability and Validity of a Chinese Version of the Parental Bonding Instrument

Validation Of The Chinese Version Of Kidscreen-10 Quality Of Life Questionnaire: A Rasch Model Estimation

Reliability and Validity for Chinese Version of Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory PedsQL4.0

Reliability and Validity of Experience of Close Relationship-Revised Version

The reliability and validity of Child-to-parent Violence Questionnaire (CPV-Q) among Chinese adolescents

A Study on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire(SDQ)

Reliability and validity for Chinese Version of Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory PedsQLTM3.0 Cardiac Module

Research in Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of Nocturia Quality of Life Questionnaire

The Revision of Interpersonal Competence Questionnaire in Middle School Students