Abstract:Background Adolescence involves a period of swift change, including the development of personality vulnerabilities (i.e., dependency and self-criticism) that act as transdiagnostic factors to psychopathology. Over the past several decades, numerous short revisions have condensed the Depressive Experiences Questionnaire (DEQ) into more efficient measures of personality vulnerability. Prior research has investigated the psychometric properties of the short DEQs in adult and clinical samples. However, there has been insufficient exploration within adolescents, who are in addition marked by fluctuating personality vulnerabilities. Method A representative large sample of adolescents and emerging adults in China aged 10 to 25 ( N = 23,953) was administered five short DEQs, including the Revised DEQ (RevDEQ), Reconstructed DEQ (RecDEQ), Theoretical DEQ-21/12 (TDEQ-21/12) and adolescent DEQ (DEQ-A). The data was evaluated for internal consistency and criterion-related validity, while factor structure and measurement invariances across gender and age groups were analyzed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). A subset of the original sample ( N = 2874) was retested after six months and analyzed for test-retest reliability and cross-time invariance. Result CFA of the TDEQ-21/12 and RecDEQ supported the intended two-factor model. Good criterion-related validity, internal consistency and test-retest reliability for these three versions were found. Satisfying measurement invariances across gender, time, and age groups were established. Limitation The study's scope was confined to non-clinical adolescent populations within China, highlighting a gap in cross-cultural and clinical applicability. Conclusion The present study supports the use of the TDEQ-21/12 and RecDEQ as valid and concise instruments for measuring Chinese adolescent personality vulnerability.

Testing the reliability and validity of the Experiences in Close Relationships Scale–Short Form with Chinese college students

Chinese Version of the Responses to Positive Affect Questionnaire: Testing the Factor Structure, Reliability, and Validity in A College Student Sample

Reliability and Validity Test of Chinese Version of the Experience of Close Relationship in Adolescents

Reliability and Validity of Experience of Close Relationship-Revised Version

A Preliminary Study on Self-constructionals Scales (scs)of Chinese-Version

Validation of the Emotional Intelligence Scale

Reliability and validity of the short version of the childhood abuse self report scale in Chinese college students

Reliability and validity of the romantic partner conflict scale in Chinese people

Reliability and validity of a simplified touch experiences and attitudes questionnaire for Chinese college students

Validation of Emotional Intelligence Scale in Chinese University Students

Validation of the Personal Need for Structure Scale in Chinese.

Validation and extension of the Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy in the Chinese setting.

Reliability and Vaiidatioa of the Social Comparison Orientation Scale

Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the 15‐item Need for Closure Scale: Scale validation and associations with mental health

Development and Validation of the Chinese Version of Short-Form of Interpersonal Sensitivity Measure (IPSM)

Validating the Chinese version of short‐form foreign language classroom anxiety scale

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Positive and Negative Affect Schedule-Expanded in 660 college students

The reliability and validity of the brief measures of perceived childhood harshness and unpredictability: A revised Chinese version for emerging adults

Investigating psychometric properties of short versions of the depressive experiences questionnaire: Findings from a representative large sample of Chinese adolescents

The validation of a Mandarin version of the Empathy Components Questionnaire (ECQ-Chinese) in Chinese samples

Chinese College Students' General and Relationship‐specific Representations of Adult Attachment: Variable‐centred and Person‐centred Analysis