Reliability and Validity of Urban Built Environment Evaluation Tool for Physical Activity

DU Yu-kun,SU Meng,LIU Qing-min,REN Yan-jun,LI Li-ming,LV Jun
2012-01-01
Abstract:Objective To study the reliability and validity of urban built environment evaluation tool for physical activity.Methods Six communities in Hangzhou City were selected according to urban public building functional area.A total of 205 segments were assessed.A pair of auditors assessed the street segments at the same time but worked independently.Approximately half of the segments(n=104) were audited twice by the same auditor 7 days apart.Inter-rater reliability was assessed by comparing the audits of pairs of auditors,while intra-rater reliability was evaluated by comparing an auditor's repeated assessments of the same segments.The construct validity was tested by using factor analysis.Results The majority of inter-rater reliability was above 0.8.Intra-rater reliability was lower than inter-rater reliability.The majority of intra-rater reliability was above 0.4.The face validity of questionnaire was good.Six factors were found by factor analysis and the factor loading matrix showed that construct validity was good.Conclusions The evaluation tool is a reliable and validated measure of urban built environment in Hangzhou City.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?