The Impact of Individualistic Cultural Traditions on Subjects of Higher Education in the United Kingdom
ZHANG Wen-jun,ZHANG Jian,XU Wei-min
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3785/j.issn.1008-942x.2007.02.016
2007-01-01
Abstract:Cultural analysis is one of the important methodologies for comparative education,recommended strongly by such famous comparative educationists as Kandel,Cowen,GU Ming-yuan.Using this methodology,this paper tries to analyze the subjects' development of higher education in the U.K.from the perspective of it's individualist culture tradition.Individualism,which emphasizes self responsibility of the individuals(including individual persons,agents or institutions),is the core characteristic of the British nationality.It accompanies with empiricism philosophically and eclecticism practically.Throughout the process of subjects' development of higher education in the U.K.,individualism has functioned strongly.In the beginning of higher education development,subjects are set up by individual universities completely,sponsored by individuals or individual organizations.In the 19th century,higher education system developed quickly with lots of colleges emerging without a university title.University of London began to provide degree awarding services for these colleges in 1958.However,colleges still had the autonomy of establishing their own subjects' system.After World War II,the University Grants Committee tried to influence on the subjects by its power on national grants allocation.Robins Reports enhanced a dual higher education system in 1963,within which universities and other higher education institutions,including colleges and polytechnics,were all encouraged to flourish.Council for National Academic Awards(CNAA) emerged in 1964 to control the subjects' establishment of those institutions.In the mean while,universities still kept their power of managing their subjects individually.The government dismissed CNAA in 1992 and established a university title application system,in which new universities gained power in setting their subjects individually,and old universities still kept their autonomy in subjects' establishment and management.The dissolution of CNAA indicated the strong influence of individualist tradition which ended up with the 'weakness' of governmental control in subjects' development and management.Individualism was also manifested in the academic coding system which was decentralized,elaborate and dispersive,in the flourish of strong prestigious traditional subjects,and in the market orientation of subjects' establishment in the U.K.The conclusion of this paper is that cultural traditions are strong elements for subjects' development and management in higher education in the U.K.We should take our own tradition and cultural into account seriously when studying or borrowing from other countries' experiences.