Abstract:According to Article 10 of the 1982 Constitution,a dualist structure of land ownership was established in China.Such an institutional arrangement was originally intended to better protect rural land and the interest of peasants,but has now degenerated into the most serious discrimination against the peasants in China.Not only is the use of rural land strictly regulated,but the title of rural land cannot be transferred without being first expropriated by government and converted into state land.This article discusses the nature of the collective ownership of China's rural land,and aims to reconstruct a more peaceful and just land management regime. In contrast to the city land owned by the state or the whole people,the collectively owned rural land may acquire a degree of substantive ownership.Nevertheless,lessons from China's history indicate that the right to use the rural land shall ultimately resides in individual peasants or their households,and such individualized right shall be respected and protected by law.China's rural land has long been greatly devalued,however,by the legal restrictions on the right to use rural land.The irrational and discriminative regulatory regime over China's rural land needs fundamental reform,so as to return to the farmers the collective land property right as conferred by the 1982 Constitution,and to disconnect land expropriation with the urbanization process. In fact,the substantive issue associated with urbanization is the urban planning and the examination and approval of the land use change by local governments.In this respect,the existing planning process in China,seriously deficient in democratic participation,is often carried out at the mercy of official whim.The American experience of bringing rule of law to the local zoning and review processes may provide some inspiration for China.To assure the rationality of local planning and related examination and approval,it is indispensible to bring democracy to the legislative and civil participatory processes.It is also necessary to establish an appropriate judicial review mechanism to safeguard the legality of the purpose and procedure of planning.

Constitutional Constraint on the State Ownership of Natural Resources

Research on the Constitution of Regulatory Taking

On the Role of Public Property in Human Rights Protection in China

On Public Trust Doctrine of Natural Resources and It's Revelation to China

Exploration on the Basic Theory and Legislative Structure of State Ownership

Theoretical Discussion and Reconsideration on the Dual Structure of the Land Ownership in China from the Perspective of Constitutionalism

Regulation on Behavior Freedom Outside in the Right

Paradox of Collective Ownership of China's Rural Land and Its Resolution

Ladm-Based Model For Natural Resource Administration In China

Application of Principle of legal Reservation to the Security of Citizen's Property Right

The Resource Boom in China’s Resource-Rich Provinces

The Deficiency and Countermeasures of Private Legal Relief for the Ecological Damages to Natural Resources in China

Options for the Procurement of Environmental Water Rights-Market Allocation or Government Regulation?

Study on Capitalization Problem of Natural Resources as State-owned Assets

On the Legal Arrangement of Property Law to State-Owned Property Rights

The Permanent Sovereignty of Natural Resources, WTO Rule and Privatization or Marketnization

The Owners under the Property Law of Mainland China

A Preliminary Study into Economic Constitution:Constitutional Interpretation of Right of Decision on Adoption of a Tax-sharing System

"Just Compensation" and the Constitutional Restriction on Expropriation

Natural Gas Development and Land Use: Conflict between Legal Rights and its Resolution

Transcending the Dilemma of “public Interest”