Nursing Comparision for Patients Undergoing Procedure For Prolapse And Haemorrhoids (PPH) and Conventional haemorrhoidectomy

Wang Hongmei,Zhong Yunshi,Yao Liqing
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16821/j.cnki.hsjx.2005.12.006
2005-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the quality and efficiency of nursing for patients undergoing PPH and conventional haemorrhoidectomy. Methods Both groups received psychological nursing, pre-operation consoling and post-operational conventional nursing. Post-operational parameters including training active recovery of physical force, mean duration of hospital stay and suffering were compared and analyzed in both groups. Results The time for PPH is significantly different compared with the time for conventional haemorrhoidectomy (P<0. 05). It was an advanced non -invasive surgery for haemorrhoids. (operation duration 9. 5 ± 0. 8 min vs 41 ± 1. 5 min; mean duration of hospital stay 2. 3 ± 1. 2 d vs 11. 8 ± 2. 6 d) Conclusion PPH is non-invasive, short duration of hospitalization, early recovery, and no recrudescence. It's the key for greatly improving nursing efficiency and quality.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?