Clinical application of PPH in treatment of severe hemorrhoids

QIAN jun,HUANG Xuefeng,SONG Zhangfa
2008-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the effects of procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids( PPH ) with that of traditional hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of severe hemorrhoids(grade Ⅲ or Ⅳ). Methods Eighty patients with severe hemorrhoids were randomly divided into PPH group and the traditional Million-Morgen group. Each group has 40 patients. The operating time, hospitalization time, postoperative pain, bleeding, postoperative urinary retention, and recovery time in each group were compared. Results The operation time were (29.45±6.91)min and (48.65±10.65)min in the PPH and traditional group , respectively(t=17.81, P<0.05); hospitalization stay time was (3.03±1.49) days vs. (6.10±2.51) days(t=11.40, P<0.05); the recovery work time was (8.00±1.73) days vs. (19.78±10.60) days(t=12.48, P<0.05). PPH group patients had less postoperative pain and no anal stricture and had obvious differences with tranditional group(χ2=11.52,11.40, P<0.05); there were no statistic differences in postoperative urinary retention and bleeding between the two groups(χ2=0.18,0.52, P>0.05). Conclusions PPH is a safe and effective treatment method for third or fourth degree hemorrhoids with the advantages of shorter time hospitalization and faster recovery.It could become an alternative for the conventional hemorrhoidectomy in proper patients.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?