Abstract:Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of two procedures in the treatment of hemorrhoid: the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) and stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR). Methods: A retrospective cohort research was conducted. Clinical data of 263 patients undergoing the first elective surgery for grade IV hemorrhoids by the same team of surgeons at our department from January 2015 to December 2016 were analyzed retrospectively, while those had other anorectal diseases, emergency surgery, inflammatory bowel disease, tumor and incomplete clinical data were excluded. PPH was performed in 129 patients and STARR was performed in 134 patients. PPH procedure: a circular purse 2-0 string suture was made at 4 cm above the dentate line; in accordance with the standard protocol, the PPH circular stapling devicewas introduced; the suture was closed, and a pull-through followed; the traction was continued; the stapler was fired; the prolapsed mucosa and submucosa were removed. STARR procedure: 3-5 needles were sutured in the anterior rectal mucosa, protecting the posterior wall mucosa; with the help of a finger the PPH stapler was inserted into the vaginal lumen; the sutures were hooked from both sides of the stapler to maintain traction; according to the disease condition, the suturewas tightened appropriately; stapler was screwed and activated; the anterior wall mucosa was removed; the joint of the both ends of anastomosis was cut; the posterior wall mucosa was removed as well. The short-term efficacy, surgical safety and prognosis of the two groups were compared. Results: There were 67 males (51.9%) in the PPH group and 57 (42.5%) males in the STARR group. The median age of the two groups was 51.0 (22.0, 80.0) years and 49.0 (24.0, 74.0) years, respectively. There were no significant differences in the baseline data between the two groups (all P>0.05). No significant differences in the intraoperative bleeding, length of hospital stay, postoperative analgesic drug use, postoperative bleeding, postoperative infection, etc. were found between two groups (all P>0.05). As compared to PPH group, STAAR group had longer operation time and higher hospitalization cost with significant differences [(44.0±19.3) minutes vs. (26.3±8.5) minutes, t=9.701, P=0.001; (11 047±473) yuan vs. (7674±309) yuan, t=32.826, P=0.001]. One case in STAAR group developed rectovaginal fistula. The median follow-up period of the whole group was 40 (33, 52) months. A total of 108 cases in STARR group and 114 cases in PPH group completed the follow-up. The 3-year disease-relapse rate was 0 in STARR group and 4.2% in PPH group (P=0.042). Conclusion: STARR procedure can improve the prognosis in the treatment of grade IV hemorrhoid, but attention should be paid to the development of complications.

[Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids with Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of prolapsed hemorrhoids]

Clinical application of PPH in treatment of severe hemorrhoids

Comparison of Long-Term Efficacy on III Degree Hemorrhoids Between Procedure for Prolapse and Hemorrhoids and Milligan-Morgan Hemorrhoidectomy

The safety and efficacy of stapled hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids: a systematic review and meta-analysis of ten randomized control trials

Comparison of Efficacy Between Procedure for Prolapse and Hemorrhoids and Open Hemorrhoidectomy

Safety and efficacy of procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids in the treatment of severe hemorrhoids:a systematic review of 10 randomized controlled trials

[Efficacy of the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids combined with external hemorrhoids excision in the treatment of III or IV mixed hemorrhoids]

Procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids vs traditional surgery for outlet obstructive constipation

Comparative Research of Tissue-selecting Therapy and Precedure for Prolapse and Hemorrhoids on Treating Hemorrhoids

A Randomized Multicenter Clinical Trial of RPH With the Simplified Milligan-Morgan Hemorrhoidectomy in the Treatment of Mixed Hemorrhoids

Comparison of clinical outcomes of multi-point umbrella suturing and single purse suturing with two-point traction after procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) surgery

[Therapeutic Comparison Between Procedure for Prolapse and Hemorrhoids and Ligasure Technique for Hemorrhoids].

Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy combined with non-doppler hemorrhoidal artery ligation for the treatment of grade III/IV hemorrhoids: a single centre retrospective study

Modified Ligation Procedure for Prolapsed Haemorrhoids Versus Stapled Haemorrhoidectomy for the Management of Symptomatic Haemorrhoids (molish): Randomized Clinical Trial

Evaluation of clinical efficacy of suture-fixation mucopexy in the treatment of prolapsed hemorrhoid

[Procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids versus stapled transanal rectal resection in the treatment of grade IV hemorrhoids].

Therapeutic analysis of 226 cases with severe hemorrhoids treated by PPH

Nursing Comparision for Patients Undergoing Procedure For Prolapse And Haemorrhoids (PPH) and Conventional haemorrhoidectomy

Evaluation of the Procedure for Prolapse and Hemorrhoids:Three Years'experiences

Procedure for Prolapsed Hemorrhoids Treatment for III, IV Hemorrhoids Efficacy

Comparison of Curative Effect Between Tissue-Selecting Therapy Stapler and Procedure for Prolapse and Hemorrhoids for Stage Ⅲ and Ⅳ Hemorrhoids