Application Analysis on Detection of Four Serum Indicators with a Domestic Chemiluminescence Reagent in Liver Fibrosis Diagnosis

姜菲菲,王文静,赵秀英,姚瑶,朱东,于艳华
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15932/j.0253-9713.2012.03.018
2012-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate diagnostic value of liver fibrosis for detecting the serum indicators of hyaluronic acid(HA), laminin(LN), procollagen Ⅲ N-terminal peptide (PⅢNP) and collagen type Ⅳ(CⅣ)with domestic chemical luminescence (CL) reagent. Methods Serum indicators of HA, LN, PⅢNP and CⅣwere detected with CL reagent in 123 cases of chronic hepatitis patients by pathological diagnosis(case group) and 30 healthy control(control group). Case group were divided into S0~S4 stages and diagnostic value was evaluated. Results It showed that the HA、LN、CIV in the case group were significantly higher than in control group[(4.47±0.86) vs. (2.02±0.23), P = 0.000;(4.15±0.81) vs. (3.57±0.67), P = 0.002; (3.49±0.89) vs. (2.15±0.81), P = 0.000]. All of the four serum indicators showed control group S0, S1 S2, S2 S3, HA and CⅣ dropped, LN and PⅢNP rose in S4 phage. There was statistically significance of four serum indicators in different liver fibrosis stages (P 0.01). It showed that there was significant difference between S0 and S2 group, S1 and S2 group (P 0.05). The other 3 indicators except HA were significantly correlated with fibrosis stage (P 0.01). Areas under receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve (AUC) for diagnosis of liver fibrosis were CⅣ(0.790)HA(0.775) LN(0.725)PⅢNP(0.644), successively. Multiple serum indicators showed high sensitivity and accuracy of HA , three combination of HA+LN+CⅣand four indicators combination in diagnosis of liver fibrosis. Comprehensive diagnosis efficiency was CⅣLNPⅢNP. Positive likelihood ratio of single to combination detection was 1~3. Conclusions The four indicators have certain value for diagnosis of liver fibrosis, however, it is limited in diagnosis of early liver fibrosis. It has prominent significance in fibrosis S2 stage. With aggravation of liver fibrosis, HA and CⅣ reversely decline. It may be related with decomposition and reduction of extracellular matrix. It is suitable for application of multi-indicator combination to exclude liver fibrosis. Positive likelihood ratio of all single and combination detection to diagnose liver fibrosis is much lower. It indicates limited diagnosis value and can't substitute liver biopsy.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?