Evaluation of serum non-invasive methods for the diagnosis of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection

蒋艳明,刘静,尤宁宁,王洁,陈公英,潘孝本,施军平
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn331340-20211209-00240
2022-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To investigate the diagnostic value of single or combined application of fibrosis index based on the 4 factors (FIB-4) , aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index(APRI) and Gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase to platelet ratio (GPR) for progressive liver fibrosis in patients with chronic HBV infection.Methods:A total of 275 patients who underwent liver biopsy in the Affiliated Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University from August 2017 to August 2020 and were diagnosed with chronic HBV infection were enrolled. According to the gold standard for the diagnosis of significant liver fibrosis as S≥2, they were divided into non-significant fibrosis(S0-1) group and significant fibrosis(S2-4) group. The levels of FIB-4, APRI, GPR, FIB-4+APRI(FA), APRI+GPR(AG) and FIB-4+GPR(FG) were analyzed between two groups. The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was drawn to evaluate the value of these serum non-invasive diagnostic methods alone or combination in diagnosis of progressive liver fibrosis in chronic HBV infection.Results:The levels of FIB-4, APRI, GPR, FA, AG and FG in S0-1 group were significantly lower than those in S2-4 group ( t=-7.85, -8.89, -9.13, -8.86, -10.27 and -9.92, P all<0.001). For single application, it showed that FIB-4 had the best diagnostic efficiency with the AUC of 0.800, the sensitivity of 90.91% and the specificity of 58.85%. For combined application, it showed that FG had the best diagnostic efficiency with the AUC of 0.840, the sensitivity of 83.33%, and the specificity of 75.12%. Conclusions:GPR, APRI, FIB-4, FA, AG and FG have the certain clinical value in the diagnosis of progressive liver fibrosis. For single use, FIB-4 has the best diagnostic efficacy in the diagnosis of progressive liver fibrosis in patients with HBV infection. However, the diagnostic efficacy of the combination is better than that of single use, especially the combination of FIB-4 and GPR.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?