Comparison of GPR, APRI and FIB-4 in predicting severity of liver fibrosis associated with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B

Xiu-fen LI,Wei LU,Yun-he PAN,Jie WANG,Zhan-qing ZHANG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16118/j.1008-0392.2018.03.012
2018-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare GPR ( γ-glutamyl transpeptidase to platelet ratio ) , APRI ( aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index) and FIB-4 ( fibrosis index based on the 4 factors) in predicting the severity of liver fibrosis associated with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B ( CHB). Methods Total 859 patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B were randomly divided into training set ( n=578) and validation set ( n=281). With reference to the Scheuer liver pathological scoring system, pathological stage≥S2,≥S3 and ≥S4 were defined as significant, extensive and advanced fibrosis. Results There were no significant differences in the prevalence of the significant, extensive and advanced fibrosis between training set and validation set ( P> 0. 05). There were no significant differences in the areas under the ROC curves ( AUROCs) of GPR, APRI and FIB-4 in predicting the significant, extensive and advanced fibrosis between training set and validation set ( P>0. 05). In the training set, the AUROCs of GPR and APRI in predicting significant fibrosis, and AUROCs of GPR, APRI and FIB-4 in predicting extensive and advanced fibrosis were greater than 0. 750 ( the lower limits of 95%CI>0. 700) ; and the AUROC of FIB-4 in predicting significant fibrosis was 0. 700-0. 750 ( the lower limit of 95%CI<0. 700). In the validation set, the AUROC of GPR in predicting significant fibrosis, and the AUROCs of GPR, APRI and FIB-4 in predicting extensive fibrosis, and the AUROCs of GPR and FIB-4 in predicting advanced fibrosis were greater than 0. 750 ( the lower limits of 95%CI>0. 700) ; and the AUROCs of APRI in predicting extensive and advanced fibrosis were 0. 700-0. 750 ( the lower limits of 95%CI<0. 700) ; and the AUROC of FIB-4 in predicting significant fibrosis was <0. 700. Conclusion In the framework of HBeAg-negative CHB patients, GPR and APRI in predicting the significant fibrosis, GPR and FIB-4 in predicting extensive and advanced fibrosis have moderate predictive efficiency and good reliability; while FIB-4 in predicting the significant fibrosis and APRI in predicting the advanced fibrosis have relatively low efficiency.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?