Reconstructing Dual Liability Imputation System of Tort Law:Risk Domain Theory
Ye Jinqiang
2009-01-01
Abstract:The traditional liability imputation system of tort law is based on fault liability and danger liability, in which danger liability is considered as an exception to fault liability. The traditional fault liability principle consists of two facets, that is "Where there is fault, there is liability" and "No fault, no liability". However, as the rising of intercourse safety responsibility (Verkehrspflichten), the evolution of fault liability and the expansion of liability without fault, the tort law seems to fall into a state of chaos. Behind the chaotic state, the evolution of liability imputation system of tort law demonstrates that the principle of "No fault, no liability" has been gradually replaced by the rising of risk liability. This fundamental change means that the modern tort law no longer adopts the principle of "casum sentit dominus", but distributes the liability of damage without fault between the parties by deciding who should carry on the risk. The elements of deciding the risk domains includes acquisition of interest, initializing and maintaining risk, reliance, possibility of damage distribution, possibility of self—protection, and so on. In addition, the theory of risk domain has the ability to establish an open and dynamic liability distribution system. In individual cases, it can reach the balance among different elements of considerations. The new dual liability imputation system of modern tort law should consist of fault liability and risk liability, and the risk liability can replace all the liability without fault including the danger liability (Gef(a|¨)hrdungshaftung), liability without fault in intercourse safety responsibility (Verkehrspflichten) and equitable liability. The legislation of risk liability can adopt the mode of combining general provisions with specific types of risk liability.