Comparison of Micro-polluted River Water Treatment by G-BAF and Activated Sludge Process

Yan-zhi QU,Cao LIU,Ri-hong LIAO,Lei YAO,Zheng-fang YE,Pei-jing WANG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.19853/j.zgjsps.1000-4602.2010.01.019
2010-01-01
Abstract:Micro-polluted river water was treated by gaia-biological aerated filter ( G-BAF) and conventional activated sludge process ( CAS). The comparison of the removal rates reveals that G-BAF has great advantages to treat micro-polluted water. In the later experimental stage, the average removal rates of turbidity, COD, NH_3 - N and TP by G-BAF are 90.0% , 50. 1% , 93.5% and 51.1% , which are above 40% higher than those by CAS. The effluent of G-BAF mainly contains carboxylic acid and ke-tones, while the effluent of CAS still contains lots of refractory organic compounds. There are lots of bacteria, protozoan and metazoan species immobilized on the carrier surface in G-BAF, which can enhance the removal effect of nitrogen, phosphorus and refractory organic compounds.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?