Abstract:The passive Responsibilism,"nulla poena sine culpa",is a commonly agreed criminal principle and the basic requirement of human rights.Penalty measurement concerns the protection of the human rights of defendants and even the general human rights condition in a country,thus the Point theory of penalty measurement,which is the inevitable conclusion of the passive Responsibilism,should be adopted.According to the Point theory,criminal responsibility determines the toplimit of a punishment.Only under this point can judges consider the necessity of crime prevention.The opinion and its practice of measuring penalty beyond the toplimit decided by responsibility for the necessity of crime prevention or sentencing a heavier punishment under the responsibility—decided penalty (point) for the needs of general prevention not only go against Responsibilism,but also violate defendants' dignity. In fact,synthesis idealism calls for a balance between responsibility—related and prevention —related punishment and judges need to tell which one is influenced by a special plot,because prevention—related plots can be only considered under responsibility—decided penalty (point). The principle of suiting punishment to crime,which is interpreted as heavy punishment fits heavy offense and light punishment fits minor offense,is just for responsibility—decided penalty,not for declaratory penalty.As to declaratory punishment,such principle should be applied asymmetrically. Namely,in accordance with the Point theory,this principle means only that a punishment can not exceed the responsibility—decided toplimit.In this way,although this principle can be interpreted as light punishment fits minor offense,a heavy penalty does not always follow a heavy crime.On the contrary,a light punishment may be sentenced considering minor needs of prevention, even if a heavy crime is accused.To put it bluntly,the principle of suiting punishment to crime permits a sentence under responsibility—decided penalty (point). Neither Current criminal theories guiding discussion on the criterion and method of penalty measurement nor the judicial practice insisting on the normalization of penalty measurement fully consist with Responsibilism.For criminal theory and practice,the highest priority is to carry out Responsibilism in the theory and practice of penalty measurement.

Serious Treatment for Measurement of Penalty--on the procedural sentence

The Perfection of Non-penalty Rectification System about Minor Crime in our Country

On the Procedural Sanction of the Criminal Actions

Responsibilism and the Doctrine of Penalty Measurement

On the Investigation of Sentencing Information

From Technique to System:On the Innovation of Sentencing Procedure

On Discretionary Mechanism of Penalty for Minor Offenders

Models of Sentencing Procedural Reform

Report on A Research Experiment on the Independent Sentencing Procedure: A Sample from the Wuhu Model

Procedural Justice Through Substantive Reform: A Possible Path to the Procedural Reform of Reduction of Penalty

Research on Sentencing Evidence Under the Background Of Sentencing Procedure Reform.

Controlling Criminal Procedural Violation by Criminal Procedural Sanction

On the Method of Defining the Criterion of Sentencing

The Road to Independent Sentencing Procedure by Reference to Foreign Experience

On Establishing Seprarate Process of Sentence in China

Discussion on the System of Sentencing Proposal

The Criminal Policy of Temper Justice with Mercy and the Reform of Fine Penalty

Judicial Review of the Balance Between Crime and Punishment

On the Independence of Sentencing Process

Interaction of Sentencing and Conviction:Charges Changed for Fair Sentencing

The Penalty Aplication of Ways to Explore a Number of Issues