The Comparison of Open and Closed Treatment of Mandibular Condylar Fractures

H.H. Zhou,Z.B. Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2009.03.304

2009-01-01

Abstract:Background and Objectives: The treatment of condylar process fractures has generated a great deal of discussion and controversy in oral and maxillofacial trauma. The purpose of our study was to compare operative and conservative treatment of condylar fractures of mandible.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Closed Reduction, Open Reduction, and Endoscopic Assistance: Current Thoughts on the Management of Mandibular Condyle Fractures

Richard H. Haug,M Todd Brandt

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000260730.43870.1b

2007-12-01

Abstract:The management of fractures of the mandibular condyle continues to be controversial. This is in part attributable to a misinterpretation of the literature from decades prior, a lack of uniformity of classification of the various anatomical components of the mandibular condyle, and a perceived potential to cause harm through the open approach based in part on the surgeon's lack of a critical examination of the literature. This review explores the key historical articles that deal with the management of mandibular condyle fractures, and those modern-day contributions that represent the state of the art. The authors' intention was to provide the reader with an objective summary of the management of this form of injury, to place its management into a modern-day perspective, and perhaps to minimize the perception of controversy.

surgery
A sexual affiliation network of swingers, heterosexuals practicing risk behaviours that potentiate the spread of sexually transmitted infections: A two-mode approach

A. Niekamp,L. Mercken,C. Hoebe,N. Dukers-Muijrers

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2013.02.006

2013-05-01

Abstract:
A Comparison of the Clinical Effect of Two Fixation Methods on Hoffa Fractures

Yi Xu,Heng Li,Hong-hang Yang,Zhi-jun Pan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2861-6

2016-01-01

SpringerPlus

Abstract:Hoffa fractures are rare and difficult to treat for orthopaedic surgeons. The mechanism of injury of Hoffa fracture is still unknown and the operation approch and fixation method are still controversial. The aim of this study is to compare the clinical effect between two fixation methods on Hoffa fractures.
[A Meta-Analysis of Condylar Fracture Treatment].

Deng-hui Duan,Yi Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/j.issn:1002-0098.2006.07.002

2006-01-01

Abstract:OBJECTIVETo systematically evaluate the surgical and non-surgical treatment of condylar fracture using Meta-analysis system.METHODSThe key words: mandible, condyle, fracture and treatment/therapy were adopted to search for the objective articles from following Data-base: Medline, Embase, CCTR and CNKI. The available data were statistically dealt with by software package (RevMan 4.1).RESULTSIn 172 associated articles, only 10 (5.8%) fulfilled the entrance criteria, involving 711 cases. A total of 307 patients underwent surgical treatment due to severely displacement or dislocation of fragment, 239 of the m (78.0%) being subcondylar fracture. A total of 404 patients received non-surgical management, 278 of them (68.7%) being lower level fracture without significant displacement. Surgical treatment outbalanced non-surgical approach in rehabilitation of occlusional relationship and an adverse outcome was noted in term of maximum mouth opening, but the re was no significant difference in postoperative joint pain.CONCLUSIONSSeverely displaced and dislocated condylar fracture is indicated for surgical treatment.
[An investigation of current consensus on the management of condylar fractures among Chinese senior maxillofacial surgeons].

Yi Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1002-0098.2010.04.002

2010-01-01

Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To determine the current consensus in the management of condylar fractures among Chinese senior oral and maxillofacial (OM) surgeons and the difference between domestic and international. METHODS:Forty-six senior OM surgeons, who were considered to be expert in management of maxillofacial trauma, were invited to participate in this investigation. A questionnaire was designed to appraise management strategies of surgical and non-surgical treatment on the 18 fractures of condylar process of mandible, which varied in fracture patterns, the degree of fragment displacement, uni-and bi-lateral involved and the age range of patients. The consensus was analyzed and then compared with the current international practice based on Baker's survey. RESULTS:Three fracture situations obtained a uniform opinion, 9 situations had tendency in the alternative of surgical and non-surgical approach, 6 situations had no preference. Of 18 fractures, 8 were advised to receive an open procedure in management of the condylar fracture compared with 4 which was considered to be in a close procedure. Others were obscure in the preference of treatment decision. Consensus was achieved in non-surgical treatment for the patients younger than 12 years in age, and the teenager patients were considered for an open treatment when fracture occurred at the base of condyle and the fragment located out of fossa. It was controversial over the treatment of sagittal or comminuted fracture and subcondylar fracture with slight displacement in the adults. The panel of surgeons admitted a practice that bilateral subcondylar dislocated fractures were indicated for open reduction and internal fixation. If the similar case occurred on the unilateral joint, most of the Chinese surgeon preferred a surgical intervention which was adverse opinion from international. CONCLUSIONS:In regard to the decision of surgical and non-surgical treatment for condylar fracture of the mandible, much controversy remained in one third of the investigated cases. The shared opinion was that the children patients should be treated by the closed methods for the condylar fracture and the bilateral subcondylar dislocated fractures were identically indicated for surgical reduction. The domestic OM surgeons seem to have a more tendency to surgery compared with their international counterparts.
Comparision of the treatment effect on the different fixation for the mandibular fractures

李志刚

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-7632.2003.03.013

2003-01-01

Abstract:Objective To evaluate the effect and complication of different treatments for mandibular fractures. Then to discuss the excellence and insufficiency of different fixation style. Methods One hundred and eighteen cases of mandibular fractures were treated by three methods respectively: intermaxillary fixation, miniplate fixation and wire fixation with intermaxillary fixation. Function recovering time, treatment complications and the relationship between the fracture degree and fixation method as well as their complications were analysed statisticly. Results The complication rate of each treatment was different. There were high correlation between the severity of fracture and the complication. Intermaxillary fixation was a simple method for the treatment of mandibular fractures. But the limitation of mouth open was too long, so functional recovery was slower, and then more complications. Wire internal fixation with intermaxillary fixation increased stability, but extra - oral incision may cause facial nerve injury. The time of open mouth limition was also long. Miniplate internal fixation rarely affected periodontium and temporomandibular joint. It did not limit mouth open,so time of functional recovery was very quick. However, it will injury dental root and the inferior alveolar nerve when put on wrong place. And furthermore may induce bad bite relationships. Conclusion Miniplate internal fixation for the treatment of mandibular fractures was much better than that of intermaxillary fixation and wire internal fixation with intermaxillary fixation for the less complications, quicker functional recovery and no injury of facial nerve selected the intraoral incision.
[What would you do? Borderline ocular hypertension, visual field changes, and papillary atrophy in a 65-year-old patient].

A. Béchetoille,A. Bron,P. Demailly,J. Nordmann

1998-04-01

Journal Francais d'Ophtalmologie

Abstract:
Treatment of mandible fractures: A retrospective clinical analysis of 148 cases

YANG Zhen,CAO Gang,XIAO Ping,SHOU Bai-quan,LI Jie-shou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-8199.2008.04.012

2008-01-01

Abstract:Objective: To search for a best method for management mandible fractures by evaluating the effects of different treatments.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 148 cases of mandible fractures treated in our department from January 1996 to June 2007.Results: Among the total number,134 cases were restored to normal occlusion,while 6 cases experienced local occlusive disfunction and 8 malocclusion.The effect of treatment was correlated with the types of fracture and methods of diaplasis.Conclusion: Mandible fractures should be treated with a new concept of combined and sequential multidisciplinary methods.Sound diaplasis followed by reliable fixation can produce a satisfying curative effect.At present,intermaxillary elastic traction with internal titanium plate fixation is the most effective method for the management of mandible fractures.
Comparison of temporomandibular joint function and morphology after surgical and non-surgical treatment in adult condylar head fractures

Rong Ren,Jiewen Dai,Yin Zhi,Fuqiang Xie,Jun Shi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2020.01.019

2020-03-01

Abstract:<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Purpose</h3><p>The aim of this study was to evaluate whether surgical treatment can distinctly improve temporomandibular joint (TMJ) function and morphology in adult patients with condylar head fractures (CHFs) when compared with conservative treatment.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Patients and methods</h3><p>A retrospective study was performed to evaluate surgical and conservative outcomes in all patients who had suffered CHFs. In this study, all patients were divided into a surgical group and a conservative group. In the surgical group patients were treated by open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) combined disc anchorage, while in the conservative group patients were treated by a removable splint combined with intermaxillary elastics. Clinical and radiological outcomes were evaluated and functional outcomes were assessed using the Helkimo index score. Paired t-tests, Wilcoxon signed rank tests, independent t-tests and χ<sup>2</sup> tests were used to assess inter-group differences.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Results</h3><p>75 TMJs in 56 patients were included in this study and were divided into a surgical group (56 TMJs in 40 patients) and a conservative group (19 TMJs in 16 patients). The results showed that the Helkimo index score for TMJ in the surgical group was better than in the conservative group (<em>p</em><sub>Ai</sub> = 0.032, <em>p</em><sub>Di</sub> = 0.001, respectively). Ramus height in the surgical group (61.08 ± 4.04 mm) recovered more than in the conservative group (54.82 ± 3.06mm) (<em>p</em> = 0.012). Discs became shorter, moved further forward, and became severely distorted in the conservative group (disc length = 7.32 ± 1.35 mm). In contrast, discs became longer, retained a normal disc–condyle relationship, and formed a normal shape in the surgical group (disc length = 11.05 ± 2.07 mm) (<em>p</em> = 0.003). According to the MRI images, joint effusion, retrodiscal tear, and lateral capsular tear were better cured in the surgical group (<em>p</em> = 0.001, <em>p</em><0.001, <em>p</em> = 0.012, respectively).</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Conclusion</h3><p>Based on these results, it seems that surgical treatment of condylar head fractures should be the preferred approach if there are no contraindications for general anesthesia.</p>

dentistry, oral surgery & medicine,surgery
COMPARISON BETWEEN PERPENDICULAR AND CONVENTIONAL FIXATION IN SYMPHYSEAL AND PARA SYMPHYSEAL MANDIBULAR FRACTURES (RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL)

Nesma Anan Mohamed,Ragab Shabban Hassan,Gaafar El Halawani,Nesma Mohamed,Ragab Hassan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21608/adjalexu.2023.168063.1321

2024-04-18

Alexandria Dental Journal

Abstract:Introduction: Mandible fractures are among the most common facial fractures to occur. The conventional internal fixation technique, uses two parallel mini-plates. The perpendicular fixation was introduced to neutralize the compression, shear and tension forces, which its done by moving the inferior mini-plate to be placed at the inferior border of the mandible perpendicularly to the sub apical mini-plate to allow for 3 dimensional fixation. Objectives: To clinically and radiographically evaluate the use of perpendicular plating protocol compared to the conventional Champy's protocol in mandibular symphyseal and para-symphyseal fractures. Materials and methods: The study was conducted on twenty patients diagnosed with symphyseal and /or para-symphyseal fractures indicated for open reduction and internal fixation. Fracture line was exposed through standard intra-oral vestibular incision to gain access to the fractures. Perpendicular plating was done in group A while conventional plating was done in group B. Results: Insignificant statistical difference was reported in pain, edema, and maximum mouth opening during the followup period when comparing both groups. One case had malocclusion In group A, while the rest of the patients in both groups showed normal occlusion. Two patients one in each group showed postoperative wound infection. By comparing postoperative 12 weeks to immediate values, average bone density had shown significant difference . Moreover, group A (p=.005 ) had a higher mean bone density than group B (p=.093 ). Conclusion: The perpendicular mini-plates fixation is suitable for the treatment of anterior mandibular fractures.

English Else
Retrospective clinical analysis of 56 cases of condylar fractures

YANG Zhen,CAO Gang,XIAO Ping,YIN Ying,SHOU Bai-quan,LI Jie-shou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.16571/j.cnki.1008-8199.2008.12.028

2008-01-01

Abstract:Objective: To evaluate different treatment methods for condylar fractures.Methods: Retrospective analyses were made of the clinical data of 56 cases of condylar fractures treated from January 1996 to December 2007.Results: Condylar fractures occurred mostly in males(82.14%),and 89.29% of the patients were aged 20-50 years.Traffic accidents accounted for 51.79% and falling 26.79% of the causes,48.21% of the cases accompanied with injuries of other parts of the body,and 89.29% restored to normal occlusion after surgical or non-surgical treatment.Conclusion: The effect of the treatment is related with the type and severity of the fractures,the choice of surgical indications and the standardization of treatment.A thorough evaluation of the fractures is necessitated.The best protocol for condylar fractures should be intermaxillary elastic traction,surgical anatomic reduction plus rigid internal fixation by Ti plate.
Open Treatment with Ultrasound Activated Resorbable Pins Versus Closed Treatment of Adult Mandible Condylar Head Fractures

Poonam Yadav,Vidya Rattan,Sachin Rai,Satnam Singh Jolly

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-021-01631-z

Abstract:Purpose: The purpose of the study was to investigate whether open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with ultrasound activated resorbable pins (UARPs) is superior to closed treatment of condylar head (CH) fractures. The investigators hypothesized that fixation with UARPs is superior to closed treatment of CH fracture. Methods: It was a prospective pilot study on CH fracture patients. Patients in closed group were managed conservatively with arch bar fixation and elastic guidance. Fixation in open group was done with UARPs. Assessment was done for primary objective of stability of fixation by UARPs and secondary objectives of functional outcome and complications. Results: The study sample included 20 patients (10 in each group). 10 patients (11 joints) in closed group and 9 patients (10 joints) in open group were available for final follow-up. 5 joints showed re-dislocation of fractured segment, 1 joint showed slightly imperfect but adequate fixation and 4 joints showed adequate fixation in open group. In the closed group, displaced fragment was fused with mandible at displaced position in all the joints. All the joints showed resorption of medial condylar head at 3 months follow-up in open group. There was minimal resorption of condyle in closed group. Occlusion was deranged in 3 patients in open group and 1 patient in closed group. MIO, pain scores and lateral excursions were equal in both the groups. Conclusion: The results of the present study rejected the hypothesis that fixation of CH with UARPs was superior than closed treatment. There was resorption of medial CH fragment in open group as compared to closed group.
Comprehensive comparison between conservative therapy and surgical management for completely displaced and comminuted mid-shaft clavicle fractures

Xiao Han,Yufu Zhang,Xigong Zhang,Jie Tan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-024-06198-1

IF: 3.479

2024-06-14

International Orthopaedics

Abstract:It is still controversial whether complete displaced mid-shaft clavicle fractures should be treated with internal fixation or conservative therapy. This retrospective study aims to compare clinical outcomes of two treatment protocols.

orthopedics
[Recent evaluation and analysis of the clinical effect of two closed treatment methods in children with intracapsular condyle fracture]

H Wang,Y Z Wang,J G An

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112144-20240105-00013

2024-10-09

Abstract:Objective: To summarize and analyze clinical characteristics of pediatric mandibular condylar fractures and the long-term therapeutic effects of closed treatment. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted for pediatric condylar fracture in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery of Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology from October 2015 to October 2019, including 33 males (67.3%) and 16 females (32.7%), with an average age of (8.3±2.1) years old. According to the treatment methods, the children were divided into two groups: group A was a removable occlusal splint accompanied with functional exercise, group B was a pure functional exercise. Forty-nine cases (76 sides) children with intracapsular condylar fracture were included in this study. Twenty-three cases in group A and 26 cases in group B. The maximum month opening increased from (20.0±6.2) mm to (46.0±5.3) mm 6 months after closed treatment. Subjective evaluation, special examination, qualitative analysis and quantitative analysis of imaging were used to evaluate the condylar remodeling and functional recovery of temporomandibular joint in two groups of children after closed treatment of intracapsular condyle fracture. Results: There was no significant difference in subjective evaluation, maximum opening examination, mouth open-type, mandibular protrusion, lateral movement and qualitative analysis of imaging at the six-month follow-up after injury. Quantitative imaging measurements showed that the condylar anteroposterior diameter and condylar height in Group B were significantly higher than those in Group A after 1 year of injury. Conclusions: Closed treatment for pediatric condylar fractures can achieve satisfactory results. After 6 months of injury, the children in the two groups could recover the temporomandibular joint function and promote the condylar adaptative remodeling.
COMPLICATIONS OF CONSERVATIVE AND SURGICAL TREATMENT OF FRACTURES OF THE MANDIBULAR CONDYLAR PROCESS (LITERATURE REVIEW)

I.M. Boichuk,A.V. Bambuliak

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31718/2409-0255.2.2024.07

2024-06-26

Ukrainian Dental Almanac

Abstract:One of the most pressing problems in modern maxillofacial surgery is the treatment and rehabilitation of patients with fractures of the condylar process of the mandible. According to various statistical data, the incidence of fractures at this site is 19-37%, and these fractures are the most controversial in terms of diagnosis and treatment. In recent years, there has been an increase in severe forms of mandibular condyle fractures: bilateral, combined, intra-articular, leading to serious complications that affect the functioning of the temporomandibular joint. The data obtained indicated the need for a detailed study of this pathology in order to make a qualitative diagnosis and improve the available treatment methods. The aim of the study – to analyse and summarise current data from the scientific literature on possible complications in the treatment of the condylar process fractures of the mandible. Materials and methods. The bibliosemantic method was used to clarify the state of the problem, to study the analysis of the results of previous scientific research based on the literature sources and electronic resources. Results and discussion. The management of patients with mandibular condylar fractures is widely discussed in the literature due to their high prevalence, but there is still no consensus on the optimal management of patients with this pathology. To date, there are many studies that highlight certain complications of conservative and surgical treatment, but they are not generalised or systematised. Conclusions. Summarizing, we can conclude that complications occur during both conservative and surgical treatment of patients with mandibular condyle fractures. Complications are most often associated with incomplete diagnosis, incorrect choice of treatment method, and depend on the method of access and fixation in surgical treatment.
Clinical Treatment of Mandibular Condyle Fractures:a Report of 30 Cases

李阳,刘樱,曲卫国,郑延清,王吉,裘刚,曲哲

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1005-4979.2008.06.011

IF: 1.9

2008-01-01

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Abstract:Objective:To summarize the clinical characteristics of condylar fractures of the mandible. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted in 30 patients from May 2004 to Oct 2007.Clinical characteristics and treatment results were analysed. Results: Condylar fractures usually occurred in males, traffic accident was the main leading cause.Condylar neck was the most predilection site of occurrence. 36.84% of the cases had accompanied with parasymphysis fracture.The child condylar fracture (69.85%) were cured by the conservative treatment. 3.23% of the cases might be complicated with TMJ ankylosis later. Condusion: Condylar neck was the most predilection site of fracture. Rigid internal fixation was the most selected surgical method, and the distraction osteogenesis technique might even be applied to the old condylar fracture cases.
Finite Element Analysis of Two- and Three-Dimensional Fixation in Treating Mandibular Symphyseal Fracture Combined with Bilateral Condylar Intracapsular Fractures.

Wei Zhou,Qiguo Rong,Jingang An,Yi Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000007601

2021-01-01

Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

Abstract:The aim of this study was to compare through finite element analysis two- and three-dimensional (2D and 3D) fixation in the treatment of mandibular symphyseal fracture combined with bilateral condylar intracapsular fractures. The authors created 2 fixation models for the above fracture, and analyzed the stress and displacement in the mandible and fixation materials under 3 loading conditions. The von Mises stress of the mandible and plates peaked during lateral occlusion, and was lowest during central occlusion. In all conditions, stresses in the fixation materials did not exceed the yield stress of titanium. The inferior border of the symphyseal fracture segments showed opposing displacements, and the mandible tended to widen in the 2D fixation model. However, the fracture displacement did not exceed 150 mu m for either fixation method. The results suggested that after well reduction and fixation of condylar intracapsular fractures, either 2D or 3D fixation for symphyseal fracture can provide adequately strong fixation. Compared with 2D fixation, 3D fixation has more advantages in controlling the mandibular width and preventing the fixation materials from enduring excessive stress.
EFFECTIVE STRATEGIES IN THE MANAGEMENT OF ANTERIOR MANDIBULAR FRACTURE: A COMPREHENSIVE SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Rajan Savani,Hu Weihsin,Shital Patel,Naiya Shah,Shyam Chauhan,Yashasvi Chavda

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2024.02.006

IF: 2.018

2024-02-01

British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Abstract:This review examines the prevailing modalities for fractures of the anterior mandible, which represent a significant proportion of the maxillofacial injuries commonly treated by oral and maxillofacial surgeons. The article traces the historical shift from conservative techniques to the dominant management strategies of open reduction and fixation. Encompassing a range of studies, the review, in accordance with PRISMA 2020 recommendations, meticulously examines various fixation methods, assessing their efficacy in achieving stability of fracture, early healing, and mobilisation. The comparison of these methods highlights their unique advantages and limitations, and demonstrates the need for more nuanced and precise approaches. The review emphasises evidence-based methodology in the management of anterior mandibular fractures (AMF), highlighting the benefits offered by innovative techniques such as 3D miniplates. It also acknowledges the advantages provided by older fixation devices such as lag screws. The importance of postoperative outcomes and the need for tailored treatment strategies are recognised, considering the complex nature of these fractures.

dentistry, oral surgery & medicine,surgery
A Clinical Analysis of Postoperative Pathologic Fracture of the Mandible

张雷,张益,郭传瑸,张建国,俞光岩

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-7632.2008.05.001

2008-01-01

Abstract:Objective To summarize the characteristics and the key points of treatment on postoperative pathologic fracture of the mandible.Methods Thirteen patients with postoperative pathologic fracture of the mandible were treated in our hospital from 1997 to 2007. The data were collected and analyzed, including latent pathological changes, inducement, time, position, symptom of pathologic bone fracture and the quality of residual bone. The characteristics and the operative methods were discussed.Results The major latent pathogeny caused postoperative pathologic fractures of the mandible were marginal resction of the mandible, curettage for the giant cystic lesions and radionecrosis of mandible successively. The main positions of the fractures were back-end of marginal resction of the mandible and incisura mandibulae. Internal fixation was performed for 12 patients, with mini-plates in 5 cases, reconstruction plates in 7 cases. The fractures were healed up in 6 cases. Conclusion Postoperative pathologic fracture of mandible usually occurred at incisura mandibulae. Internal fixation with reconstruction plates was the best choice of treatment.
Comparison of operatively and nonoperatively treated isolated mason type II radial head fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Binzhi Zhao,Hanzhou Wang,Shuo Diao,Xiaopei Xu,Yulin Gao,Tianchao Lu,Junlin Zhou and Yang Liu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-05039-6

IF: 2.6

2024-09-05

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research

Abstract:Radial head fractures are the most common bony injury of the elbow in adults. The current literature does not agree on whether isolated stable type II radial head fractures should be treated operatively or nonoperatively. This review aims to determine the preferred treatment for Mason type II radial head fractures and compare the outcomes of conservative and surgical treatment.

orthopedics

The Comparison of Open and Closed Treatment of Mandibular Condylar Fractures

Closed Reduction, Open Reduction, and Endoscopic Assistance: Current Thoughts on the Management of Mandibular Condyle Fractures

A sexual affiliation network of swingers, heterosexuals practicing risk behaviours that potentiate the spread of sexually transmitted infections: A two-mode approach

A Comparison of the Clinical Effect of Two Fixation Methods on Hoffa Fractures

[A Meta-Analysis of Condylar Fracture Treatment].

[An investigation of current consensus on the management of condylar fractures among Chinese senior maxillofacial surgeons].

Comparision of the treatment effect on the different fixation for the mandibular fractures

[What would you do? Borderline ocular hypertension, visual field changes, and papillary atrophy in a 65-year-old patient].

Treatment of mandible fractures: A retrospective clinical analysis of 148 cases

Comparison of temporomandibular joint function and morphology after surgical and non-surgical treatment in adult condylar head fractures

COMPARISON BETWEEN PERPENDICULAR AND CONVENTIONAL FIXATION IN SYMPHYSEAL AND PARA SYMPHYSEAL MANDIBULAR FRACTURES (RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL)

Retrospective clinical analysis of 56 cases of condylar fractures

Open Treatment with Ultrasound Activated Resorbable Pins Versus Closed Treatment of Adult Mandible Condylar Head Fractures

Comprehensive comparison between conservative therapy and surgical management for completely displaced and comminuted mid-shaft clavicle fractures

[Recent evaluation and analysis of the clinical effect of two closed treatment methods in children with intracapsular condyle fracture]

COMPLICATIONS OF CONSERVATIVE AND SURGICAL TREATMENT OF FRACTURES OF THE MANDIBULAR CONDYLAR PROCESS (LITERATURE REVIEW)

Clinical Treatment of Mandibular Condyle Fractures:a Report of 30 Cases

Finite Element Analysis of Two- and Three-Dimensional Fixation in Treating Mandibular Symphyseal Fracture Combined with Bilateral Condylar Intracapsular Fractures.

EFFECTIVE STRATEGIES IN THE MANAGEMENT OF ANTERIOR MANDIBULAR FRACTURE: A COMPREHENSIVE SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

A Clinical Analysis of Postoperative Pathologic Fracture of the Mandible

Comparison of operatively and nonoperatively treated isolated mason type II radial head fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis