Comparision of the treatment effect on the different fixation for the mandibular fractures

李志刚
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-7632.2003.03.013
2003-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the effect and complication of different treatments for mandibular fractures. Then to discuss the excellence and insufficiency of different fixation style. Methods One hundred and eighteen cases of mandibular fractures were treated by three methods respectively: intermaxillary fixation, miniplate fixation and wire fixation with intermaxillary fixation. Function recovering time, treatment complications and the relationship between the fracture degree and fixation method as well as their complications were analysed statisticly. Results The complication rate of each treatment was different. There were high correlation between the severity of fracture and the complication. Intermaxillary fixation was a simple method for the treatment of mandibular fractures. But the limitation of mouth open was too long, so functional recovery was slower, and then more complications. Wire internal fixation with intermaxillary fixation increased stability, but extra - oral incision may cause facial nerve injury. The time of open mouth limition was also long. Miniplate internal fixation rarely affected periodontium and temporomandibular joint. It did not limit mouth open,so time of functional recovery was very quick. However, it will injury dental root and the inferior alveolar nerve when put on wrong place. And furthermore may induce bad bite relationships. Conclusion Miniplate internal fixation for the treatment of mandibular fractures was much better than that of intermaxillary fixation and wire internal fixation with intermaxillary fixation for the less complications, quicker functional recovery and no injury of facial nerve selected the intraoral incision.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?