Abstract:Exploring the conditions under which cooperation can emerge in populations has long been a subject for humans. Fair preference psychology has been incorporated into the analytical framework of the public goods game. Based on considering the dynamic update of trust-driven investment willingness, we introduce a dynamic payoff allocation mechanism and loners to traditional PGG, explaining how the mechanism related to fairness preferences promotes cooperation. We assume that payoffs are equally allocated among players when the payoffs do not exceed the threshold. Otherwise, the excess portion is proportionally allocated according to the investment willingness of cooperators. The effects of parameter changes on the evolution of cooperation are investigated by conducting Monte Carlo simulations. The results show that introducing dynamic payoff allocation and loners can effectively promote cooperation in a specific range of parameters. Specifically, the existence of loners is a double-edged sword. Loners can prevent players from adopting defection behaviors on a large scale when the payoff of cooperation is unsatisfied and inhibit the emergence and diffusion of cooperative strategies as the payoff of cooperators increases. When the payoff of cooperation is dissatisfactory, the dynamic payoff allocation mechanism can promote the average investment willingness of cooperators to accelerate the spread of cooperation. However, the payoff reallocation coefficient should not be set too high, and a high-level threshold of payoff reallocation may lead to the failure of the dynamic payoff allocation mechanism. There is an optimal payoff reallocation coefficient to maximize the efficiency of the proposed mechanism. Moreover, the optimal payoff reallocation coefficient that can maximize the cooperation level is distinct for the diverse combination of enhancement factor and loss aversion coefficient. However, its value should be set at a low level in general. These results may help researchers better understand the evolution of cooperation in public goods games with dynamic resource allocation from a fairness preference perspective.

Learning and Incentive‐compatible Mechanisms for Public Goods Provision: an Experimental Study

Cooperation and Charity in Spatial Public Goods Game under Different Strategy Update Rules

The Groves-Ledyard mechanism: An experimental study of institutional design

A Deduction Mechanism for Public Goods Provision: Theory and Experiment

Research on Differences of Punishment and Reward: Evidence from Public Goods Experiments in the Stranger Condition

Cooperation dynamics in spatial public goods games with graded punishment mechanism

Chapter 67 Incentive-compatible Mechanisms for Pure Public Goods: A Survey of Experimental Research

Punishment mechanisms and cooperation in public goods games: Experimental evidence

The dynamics of human behavior in the public goods game with institutional incentives

Rare but Severe Concerted Punishment That Favors Cooperation.

Confusion cannot explain cooperative behavior in public goods games

Effects of punishment driven by inequity aversion on promoting cooperation in public goods games

Endogenous Combination of Reward and Punishment Promotes Cooperation

Conditional Contribution Mechanisms for the Provision of Public Goods in Dynamic Settings - Theory and Experimental Evidence

The regulation of good and evi promotes cooperation in public goods game

Efficient Public Good Provision by Lotteries with Nonlinear Pricing

Evolution of cooperation in public goods games with dynamic resource allocation: A fairness preference perspective

Bonus-based mercenary punishment promotes cooperation in public goods games

The effect of distribution of fines on the evolution of cooperation in spatial public goods game

Evolutionary dynamics of public goods game with tax-based rewarding cooperators

Impact of reputation-based switching strategy between punishment and social exclusion on the evolution of cooperation in the spatial public goods game