Abstract:Aims: To compare the consistency and accuracy in ocular biometric measurements and intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations using the new optical low-coherence reflectometry and partial coherence interferometry. Subjects and Methods: The clinical data of 122 eyes of 72 cataract patients were analyzed retrospectively. All patients were measured with a new optical low-coherence reflectometry system, using the LENSTAR LS 900 (Haag Streit AG)/ALLEGRO BioGraph biometer (Wavelight., AG), and partial coherence interferometry (IOLMaster V. 5.4 [Carl Zeiss., Meditec, AG]) before phacoemulsification and IOL implantation. Repeated measurements, as recommended by the manufacturers, were performed by the same examiner with both devices. Using the parameters of axial length (AL), corneal refractive power (K1 and K2), and anterior chamber depth (ACD), power calculations for AcrySof SA60AT IOL were compared between the two devices using five formulas. The target was emmetropia. Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software (SPSS 13.0) with t-test as well as linear regression. A P value < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Results: The mean age of 72 cataract patients was 64.6 years +/- 13.4 [standard deviation]. Of the biometry parameters, K1, K2 and [K1 + K2]/2 values were significantly different between the two devices (mean difference, K1: -0.05 +/- 0.21 D; K2: -0.12 +/- 0.20 D; [K1 + K2]/2: -0.08 +/- 0.14 D. P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in AL and ACD between the two devices. The correlations of AL, K1, K2, and ACD between the two devices were high. The mean differences in IOL power calculations using the five formulas were not statistically significant between the two devices. Conclusions: New optical low-coherence reflectometry provides measurements that correlate well to those of partial coherence interferometry, thus it is a precise device that can be used for the pre-operative examination of cataract patients.

Measurment of the Zernike coefficient of intraocular lenses

A MEASUREMENT AND ANALYTICAL METHOD FOR THE EFFECTS OF OBJECTIVE LENS ABERRATION ON ITS RESOLUTION

Investigation of wavefront aberrations in patients with IOL implantation after phacoemulicification

Characterization of monofocal intraocular lenses using an adaptive phase gradient-based metrology system

Effect of Aspheric (Z9001) and Standard (911a and AR40e)intraocular Lenses on Visual Function and Quality of Life

Comparison of modal and zonal wavefront measurements of refractive extended depth of focus intraocular lenses

[Comparison of Wavefront Aberrations in Pseudophakia with Three Types of Intraocular Lenses Implantation].

Study of clinical application of aberration-free aspheric intraocular lens

Clinical Observation on Higher Order Aberrations in Myopic Anisometropia

Visual quality analysis using the Chinese Catquest-9SF scale following different spherical aberration IOL implantation

Image analysis and optimize of intraocular lens

Visual Quality Analysis after Implantation of Aspheric Intraocular Lens

Description and implementation studies on field dependent wavefront aberration

Comparative Clinical Accuracy Analysis of the Newly Developed ZZ IOL and Four Existing IOL Formulas for Post-Corneal Refractive Surgery Eyes.

Analysis of higher order aberrations in recently developed wavefront-shaped IOLs

Effect of Decentration on the Optical Quality of Monofocal, Extended Depth of Focus, and Bifocal Intraocular Lenses.

Eye Model for Inspecting the Image Quality of IOLs.

Optical Quality and Higher Order Aberrations of Refractive Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses

The Influence of Decentration on Higher-Order Aberrations in Artisan Aphakic Intraocular Lens Implantation Eyes

Comparison of Two Optical Biometers in Intraocular Lens Power Calculation

Effect of monofocal, wavefront-shaped and diffractive trifocal intraocular lenses on scanning-slit automated refraction