Abstract:Historians of science have taken leave of finalism. No longer do they write teleological histories of scientific progress. Instead of a grand narrative on the triumph of science they now tend to write small stories on local knowledge. This is the result of several decades of criticism of Whig history. Starting with neo-marxist critique in the interwar years, enhanced in the social history of the 1970s, science was seen as an economic commodity and as a social product. Cultural history and anthropology added the view that scientists and scholars are mere mortals, muddling through messy life. This critique was topped off with postmodern criticism of knowledge as power, which translates into the accusation that historiography is only legitimating cultural and political oppression. To counter these allegations, many historians have insulated themselves into a kind of retro-historicism that shies away from any teleology, coherence, meaning and evaluation. It depicts the production of knowledge as a practical, local activity that is strictly limited to its cultural context. No claims to truth, validity, let alone progress or even development were allowed. This situation of rampant relativism could not last. Total abstinence of any evaluation of knowledge claims, quality of research or success of theories has proven unsatisfactory. The need has arisen to study broader issues of traveling knowledge and longer lines of scientific development. There is a shift of interest into traditions of knowledge that spring the bonds of locality and context. Why do some scientific theories and research practices succeed in surpassing paradigms and bridging epistemic ruptures? In this respect disciplines are in the process of being rehabilitated. Instead of oppressive structures they become the vehicles of sustained knowledge growth. Especially the role of education and academic training is focused on. Facing up to the charges of conceptual anachronism, historians of knowledge now opt for a cautiously evaluative history. The alternative would be an intellectually barren historicism.

Has the Study of Philosophy at Dutch Universities Changed under Economic and Political Pressures?

Universitaire En Economische Pieken (mountains and Valleys in University and Economics Research in the Netherlands)

The institutional stabilization of philosophy of science and its withdrawal from social concerns after the Second World War

[From relativism to evaluation. Recent trends in the historiography of science and the humanities]

Amsterdam Science Shop and Its Influence on University Research: the Effects of Ten Year of Dealing with Non-Academic Questions

Health care reform and financial crisis in the Netherlands: consequences for the financial arena of health care organizations

The Rise of University Colleges in Europe: A New Future for Liberal Arts & Sciences in the Twenty-First Century?

The footprint of a metrics-based research evaluation system on Spanish philosophical scholarship: an analysis of researchers perceptions

How the publish-or-perish principle divides a science: the case of economists

Appraising the philosophical influences on modern public administration research

New public management and research productivity – a precarious state of affairs of academic work in the Netherlands

Political and economic pressures on the study of religions: current trends and future prospects in the Danish context

Public sector cost management practices in The Netherlands

Economie en bedrijfskunde evalueren

Turning Universities into Actors on Quasi-markets: How New Public Management Reforms Affect Academic Research

UvA-DARE ( Digital Academic Repository ) The Logic of Empirical Theories Revisited

Science and its significant other: Representing the humanities in bibliometric scholarship

A Review of the Discipline of Philosophy of Science at Some World-Famous Universities

Information Resources: Differential Characteristics between Ibero-American and Dutch JCR Psychology Journals from 1998 to 2017

The Hows and whys of philosophy of science teaching: a comparative analysis

De Opmerkelijke Terugkeer Van De Kosten-Batenanalyse in Het Centrum Van De Bestuurspraktijk