Abstract:The socio-economic changes brought about by globalisation, the internationalisation and digitalisation of higher education, as well as the current demographic situation in Europe and Latvia, raise the issue of the competitiveness of academic staff in the context of multicultural higher education. The aim of the study is to provide a theoretical basis for the competitiveness of academic staff in the view of educational sciences, respecting the different trends and based on the conceptual approaches in personal/specialist competitiveness research. The following research methods were used: study, analysis and evaluation of scientific literature (theoretical research method); reflection of personal experience (empirical research method). As a result of the theoretical research, two trends for the substantiation of the concept of competitiveness in the educational sciences were identified. The first trend: the competitiveness of a person is substantiated through transfers from economic and management science, with a particular emphasis on specialist marketability and employability as a significant manifestation of competitiveness. The second trend: according to the new paradigm of competitiveness in educational sciences, the competitiveness of a human as a person and as a specialist is based on the perspective of pedagogy and psychology. The research results led to the conclusion that there are three conceptual approaches in the methodology of competitiveness research: 1) qualitative approach: identifies and lists competitive personality traits and qualities; 2) functional approach: describes the competitive behaviour of a person or specialist; 3) structural approach: competitiveness is substantiated as a complex combination of personal/specialist qualities, identifying several structural components. All of these approaches are also characteristic to the research of competitiveness of academic staff. The following taxonomy should be respected in the substantiation of academic staff competitiveness: 1) substantiation of personal competitiveness; 2) substantiation of specialist competitiveness in the context of different industries; 3) the substantiation of the competitiveness of specifically academic staff in the context of the specifics of higher education.

New public management and research productivity – a precarious state of affairs of academic work in the Netherlands

Individual Academic Productivity vs New Managerialism in Academic Research

The academic motherload: Models of parenting engagement and the effect on academic productivity and performance

Talent management in academia: performance systems and HRM policies

Turning Universities into Actors on Quasi-markets: How New Public Management Reforms Affect Academic Research

Job Satisfaction of Academics: Does Gender Matter?

Should the research performance of scientists be distinguished by gender?

Supporting Academic Parents: The Effects of Dependent Care Policies on Research Productivity Trends

How do you take time? Work–life balance policies versus neoliberal, social and cultural incentive mechanisms in Icelandic higher education

Gender differences in research productivity: a bibliometric analysis of the Italian academic system

Are there gender differences among researchers from industrial/organizational psychology?

A persistent gender pay gap among faculty in a public university system

Accounting for gender research performance differences in ranking universities

Human resource management–research performance linkage in higher education institutions

Public sector reform: an overview of recent literature and research on NPM and alternative paths

Theoretical substantiation of the competitiveness of academic staff from the perspective of educational sciences

How the publish-or-perish principle divides a science: the case of economists

Ecological Pushes and Pulls on Women Academics’ Pursuit of Research in China

Accounting for Research: Academic Responses to Research Performance Demands in an Australian University

GENDER PECULIARITIES OF WORK-LIFE BALANCE OF UNIVERSITY STEM-DEPARTMENTS EMPLOYEES IN UKRAINE

Sex Differences in Research Productivity : New Evidence about an Old Puzzle