Evaluation of screening effects of ELISA and IHA techniques in different epidemic areas of schistosomiasis

Wang Qz,Wang Fengfeng,Yin Xiaomei,Zhu lei,Zhang Gonghua,Fang Guoren,Wang Tianping,Xiang X,Jiang Qingwu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-2302.2006.03.004
2006-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate and compare the screening effects of ELISA and IHA techniques in different epidemic areas of schistosomiasis japanica. Methods Four villages,with different epidemicity of schistosomiasis,were selected as fields, of which every subject was examined with kato-katz, ELISA and IHA techniques simultaneously. Results The sensitivity and specificity of ELISA and IHA were very high (ELISA: 94.87%, 95.74%; IHA:89.74%,100%) . But the field-based detection indicated that the specificity of two serological techniques was relatively low (ELISA:43.21%~92.17%;IHA:67.56%~91.55%), and the PPV were remarkly low as well(ELISA:3.1%~18.6%;IHA:2.9%~15.8%). The result of the parallel detection showed that the detection values between ELISA and IHA were significantly correlating(r=0.767,P<0.01), but the corresponding OD (optical density) value of the threshold value of IHA (1:10), about 0.124~0.308, was higher than the threshold of ELISA (0.105). The positive predictive value (PPV) as well as positive rate of IHA was significantly higher than ones of ELISA in the higher endemicity villages, and no significant difference with ELISA in the lower endemicity villages. Conclusion In an endemic area of schistosomiasis, the screening effects of IHA relatively outweigh ELISA, but there was a common drawback for two serological techniques, that is, the PPV were quite low in field investigation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?