Abstract:Understanding learning and memory mechanisms is an important goal in neuroscience. To gain insights into the underlying cellular mechanisms for memory formation, synaptic plasticity processes are studied with various techniques in different brain regions. A valid model to scrutinize different ways to enhance or decrease synaptic transmission is recording of long-term potentiation (LTP) or long-term depression (LTD). At the single cell level, spike timing-dependent plasticity (STDP) protocols have emerged as a powerful tool to investigate synaptic plasticity with stimulation paradigms that also likely occur during memory formation in vivo. Such kind of plasticity can be induced by different STDP paradigms with multiple repeat numbers and stimulation patterns. They subsequently recruit or activate different molecular pathways and neuromodulators for induction and expression of STDP. Dopamine (DA) and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) have been recently shown to be important modulators for hippocampal STDP at Schaffer collateral (SC)-CA1 synapses and are activated exclusively by distinguishable STDP paradigms. Distinct types of parallel synaptic plasticity in a given neuron depend on specific subcellular molecular prerequisites. Since the basal and apical dendrites of CA1 pyramidal neurons are known to be heterogeneous, and distance-dependent dendritic gradients for specific receptors and ion channels are described, the dendrites might provide domain specific locations for multiple types of synaptic plasticity in the same neuron. In addition to the distinct signaling and expression mechanisms of various types of LTP and LTD, activation of these different types of plasticity might depend on background brain activity states. In this article, we will discuss some ideas why multiple forms of synaptic plasticity can simultaneously and independently coexist and can contribute so effectively to increasing the efficacy of memory storage and processing capacity of the brain. We hypothesize that resolving the subcellular location of t-LTP and t-LTD mechanisms that are regulated by distinct neuromodulator systems will be essential to reach a more cohesive understanding of synaptic plasticity in memory formation.

What Determines the Capacity of Autoassociative Memories in the Brain

Synaptic Conditions for Auto-Associative Memory Storage and Pattern Completion in Jensen Et Al.’s Model of Hippocampal Area CA3

Short-Term Memory And Its Biophysical Model

A Computationally Efficient Associative Memory Model of Hippocampus CA3 by Spiking Neurons

Spiking Neuron Based Cognitive Memory Model

Information capacity of a network of spiking neurons

Simulation Studies of the CA3 Hippocampal Subfield Modelled As an Attractor Neural Network.

Dynamics Analysis and Analog Associative Memory of Networks with LT Neurons.

Capacity of the Hebbian-Hopfield network associative memory

Attractor neural networks with double well synapses

Memory retrieval dynamics and storage capacity of a modular network model of association cortex with featural decomposition

Exponential Capacity of Dense Associative Memories

Pattern Retrieval in Threshold Linear Associative Nets

Maximizing memory capacity in heterogeneous networks

Autoassociative Memory Retrieval and Spontaneous Activity Bumps in Small-World Networks of Integrate-and-Fire Neurons

Advantages of dilution in the connectivity of attractor networks in the brain

Memory storage fidelity in the hippocampal circuit: the role of subregions and input statistics

Coexistence of Multiple Types of Synaptic Plasticity in Individual Hippocampal CA1 Pyramidal Neurons

Neurogenesis and multiple plasticity mechanisms enhance associative memory retrieval in a spiking network model of the hippocampus

Human hippocampal CA3 uses specific functional connectivity rules for efficient associative memory

Memory capacity of neural network models