Abstract:Decisions are faster and less accurate when conditions favor speed, and are slower and more accurate when they favor accuracy. This speed-accuracy trade-off (SAT) can be explained by the principles of bounded integration, where noisy evidence is integrated until it reaches a bound. Higher bounds reduce the impact of noise by increasing integration times, supporting higher accuracy (vice versa for speed). These computations are hypothesized to be implemented by feedback inhibition between neural populations selective for the decision alternatives, each of which corresponds to an attractor in the space of network states. Since decision-correlated neural activity typically reaches a fixed rate at the time of commitment to a choice, it has been hypothesized that the neural implementation of the bound is fixed, and that the SAT is supported by a common input to the populations integrating evidence. According to this hypothesis, a stronger common input reduces the difference between a baseline firing rate and a threshold rate for enacting a choice. In simulations of a two-choice decision task, we use a reduced version of a biophysically-based network model (Wong and Wang, 2006) to show that a common input can control the SAT but that changes to the threshold-baseline difference are epiphenomenal. Rather, the SAT is controlled by changes to network dynamics. A stronger common input decreases the model's effective time constant of integration and changes the shape of the attractor landscape, so the initial state is in a more error-prone position. Thus, a stronger common input reduces decision time and lowers accuracy. The change in dynamics also renders firing rates higher under speed conditions at the time that an ideal observer can make a decision from network activity. The difference between this rate and the baseline rate is actually greater under speed conditions than accuracy conditions, suggesting that the bound is not implemented by firing rates per se.

Noise in Attractor Networks in the Brain Produced by Graded Firing Rate Representations

Stochastic Dynamics As a Principle of Brain Function.

Confidence-related Decision Making.

Decision Making Mechanisms in the Brain

Coherent noise enables probabilistic sequence replay in spiking neuronal networks

Decision Time, Slow Inhibition, and Theta Rhythm

Sub-threshold neuronal activity and the dynamical regime of cerebral cortex

Decision-making, Errors, and Confidence in the Brain.

Cortical attractor network dynamics with diluted connectivity.

Brain Mechanisms for Perceptual and Reward-Related Decision-Making

Stochastic Resonance in Feedforward-Loop Neuronal Network Motifs in Astrocyte Field

Stochasticity from function -- why the Bayesian brain may need no noise

Structured neural fluctuations can generate noise invariance and inter-areal gating at distinct timescales

Simulation Studies of the CA3 Hippocampal Subfield Modelled As an Attractor Neural Network.

Prediction of Decisions from Noise in the Brain before the Evidence is Provided.

Quantifying the Landscape of Decision Making From Spiking Neural Networks

Stochastic Dynamics in the Brain and Probabilistic Decision-Making

Neural dynamics implement a flexible decision bound with a fixed firing rate for choice: a model-based hypothesis.

Cortical attractor dynamics and connectivity, stochasticity, psychiatric disorders, and aging

Network Structure and Input Integration in Competing Firing Rate Models for Decision-Making.

Attractor dynamics gate cortical information flow during decision-making