Abstract:The field of self-adaptive software is becoming increasingly crucial because software has to adapt its behavior at runtime to keep up with dynamic and constantly evolving environments. The ability of software to modify and adjust itself is known as adaptability, which has been acknowledged as an important quality attribute. As software architecture development represents the initial stage of the design process, architectural design has emerged as a critical development activity. The degree to which the architecture can adapt to changes will be the key factor in determining the adaptability of the software ultimately released to users. Existing metrics for software architectural adaptability typically view adaptability as a positive attribute, meaning that any possibility of change in architectural elements is perceived as an improvement in adaptability. However, the application of adaptability that leads to increased costs or complexity can only be seen as a negative attribute. In other words, the side effects brought about solely for the purpose of achieving adaptability are greatly overlooked; that is, the impacts caused by adaptability exhibit both symmetry and asymmetry for software architectural adaptability. On the other hand, the existing measures of adaptability only define it from the perspective of whether a module will change, without considering changes beyond the topological structure under multiple strategies. In this paper, we propose a comprehensive assessment approach to measure software architecture adaptability. Multiple factors are considered, including the number and types of strategies employed, the cost of completing the adaptation, the extent of changes made to the architectural elements, and the overall impact of the adaptation on the architecture. An extended UML (e-UML) component diagram is presented to model software architectural changes under various types of strategies. Finally, an experiment on the znn.com software is conducted to validate the practical feasibility of our proposed method. Our approach can assist software architects in making informed decisions regarding software architecture design options to improve the adaptability and longevity of their software systems.

Applying Architectural Reflection on Dependable Software.

An architecture-based reliability estimation framework through component composition mechanisms

Software dependability modeling using an industry-standard architecture description language

Reflection Mechanism for Software Architecture Reuse and Its Formalization

An Approach to Reliable Software Architectures Evolution

A Reflection-Based Approach For Reusing Software Architecture

Reliability analysis of digital protection's software based on architecture

A framework of SA based software deployment reliability estimation

Estimating Software System Reliability: An Architecture-Based Approach

Software Architecture Reuse Approach Based on Reflection Mechanism and Its Tool

Using Dependence Analysis to Support Software Architecture Understanding

Enhancing Software Architecture Adaptability: A Comprehensive Evaluation Method

On Improving Software Architecture

Implementation of Dynamic Software Architecture Based on Reflection

Process View of Reflection Mechanism for Reuse Software Architecture

Reflection Mechanism RMRSA for Reusing Software Architecture

Refinement-based Software Architecture Design Method

SA based software deployment reliability estimation: Problem space, challenges and strategies

Research Progress of Reliability Models Based on Software Architecture

Quality-Driven Self-Adaptation: Bridging the Gap between Requirements and Runtime Architecture by Design Decision

Study of Consistency for Reflective Software Architecture