Abstract:The field of self-adaptive software is becoming increasingly crucial because software has to adapt its behavior at runtime to keep up with dynamic and constantly evolving environments. The ability of software to modify and adjust itself is known as adaptability, which has been acknowledged as an important quality attribute. As software architecture development represents the initial stage of the design process, architectural design has emerged as a critical development activity. The degree to which the architecture can adapt to changes will be the key factor in determining the adaptability of the software ultimately released to users. Existing metrics for software architectural adaptability typically view adaptability as a positive attribute, meaning that any possibility of change in architectural elements is perceived as an improvement in adaptability. However, the application of adaptability that leads to increased costs or complexity can only be seen as a negative attribute. In other words, the side effects brought about solely for the purpose of achieving adaptability are greatly overlooked; that is, the impacts caused by adaptability exhibit both symmetry and asymmetry for software architectural adaptability. On the other hand, the existing measures of adaptability only define it from the perspective of whether a module will change, without considering changes beyond the topological structure under multiple strategies. In this paper, we propose a comprehensive assessment approach to measure software architecture adaptability. Multiple factors are considered, including the number and types of strategies employed, the cost of completing the adaptation, the extent of changes made to the architectural elements, and the overall impact of the adaptation on the architecture. An extended UML (e-UML) component diagram is presented to model software architectural changes under various types of strategies. Finally, an experiment on the znn.com software is conducted to validate the practical feasibility of our proposed method. Our approach can assist software architects in making informed decisions regarding software architecture design options to improve the adaptability and longevity of their software systems.

Study of Consistency for Reflective Software Architecture

An XML Schema based fine-grained SoC reuse methodology

Structure Reuse Methodology Based on XML Schema for Functional Level Design: A Case Study in Configuration Register Module

Design and Implementation of Reusable Software Based on Thought of Plug-in

A Role-Based SOA Architecture for Community Support Systems

A PiOZ-based formalization of a reflection-based coordination model for architecture reuse

Research on Software Architecture Based on Service Connection and Message Connection

Research on Formal Specification of Software Architecture Based on Temporal Logic

Implementation of Dynamic Software Architecture Based on Reflection

Runtime Software Architecture Based on Reflective Middleware.

On Improving Software Architecture

Design Reuse Supporting Platform for Mass Customization

Quality-Driven Self-Adaptation: Bridging the Gap between Requirements and Runtime Architecture by Design Decision

On refinement of software architectures

Validation Environment of Software Architecture Based on OCL

A methodology for high-level software specification construction.

Supporting Runtime Software Architecture: A Bidirectional-Transformation-based Approach

Enhancing Software Architecture Adaptability: A Comprehensive Evaluation Method

3Erefactor: Effective, Efficient and Executable Refactoring Recommendation for Software Architectural Consistency

Towards Collaborative Development Based on Software Architecture

Design Software Architecture Models Using Ontology.