Abstract:Automated construction of reference model (ACRM) automatically constructs reference models by assigning weights to classes for various software projects using the metadata of all software versions and historical maintenance records. ACRM can aid developers in selecting appropriate software clustering techniques in a more structured and rigorous manner by leveraging generated reference models. The undocumented evolution of a software project and its underlying architecture underscores the need to recover the architecture from the software's implementation‐level artifacts. Despite the existence of various software remodularization techniques, they often suffer from inaccuracies, and evaluating their effectiveness is challenging due to the absence of accurate "ground‐truth" architectures or reference models. Prior studies on reference model construction are time‐consuming and labor‐intensive as it heavily relies on manual analysis by domain experts. Besides, other existing approaches that directly utilize the directory or package structure of the latest version can be unreliable, lacking in‐depth analysis of the employed software structure. To address the above limitations, in this paper, we propose Automated Construction of Reference Model (ACRM), an approach for automatically constructing reference models by assigning weights to classes for various software projects using the metadata of all software versions and historical maintenance records. We evaluate ACRM through both quantitative and qualitative analyses. The experiment results provide quantitative validation and show that the generated reference models are reasonable, as confirmed by the relationship between proposed reference models and architectural smells or bugs. Furthermore, we conduct a survey among the practitioners from industry, to gain insights from practitioners' practices and further validate the generated reference models. The survey shows that, on average, 87% of the participants agree with the reference models generated by ACRM. Moreover, we propose an improved metric, wc2c, which analyzes the strengths and weaknesses of different types of software clustering techniques using the proposed reference models of the given software. Finally, we discuss the potential benefits of using ACRM in analyzed projects, particularly in terms of improving software quality, reducing maintenance costs, and enhancing developer productivity.

Reflection Mechanism RMRSA for Reusing Software Architecture

An XML Schema based fine-grained SoC reuse methodology

Design and Implementation of Reusable Software Based on Thought of Plug-in

Study on Open Architecture CNC System Based on Software Component Technology

Design Reuse Supporting Platform for Mass Customization

Runtime Software Architecture Based on Reflective Middleware.

Research on Software Architecture Based on Service Connection and Message Connection

Research on Reuse Modeling for Technical Objects Based on Modular Product Platform

Automated construction of reference model for software remodularization through software evolution

ABC: an Architecture Based, Component Oriented Approach to Software Development

SM@RT: Applying Architecture-Based Runtime Management into Internetware Systems.

A PiOZ-based formalization of a reflection-based coordination model for architecture reuse

Supporting Runtime Software Architecture: A Bidirectional-Transformation-based Approach

Automated improvement for component reuse

Building Enterprise Reuse Program

Reuse-based Software Production Technology

Design Resource Reusable Model and Process for Mass Customization

SM@RT: towards architecture-based runtime management of Internetware systems

A Reuse-based Approach to Software Process Improvement

Implementation of Dynamic Software Architecture Based on Reflection

An architecture-based approach for component-oriented development