Abstract:Project 211 is one of the most important educational policies in China, which aims at selecting a small number of “key universities” for sustainable development in the 21st century. These selected “key universities” have received substantial funding from the government so they can recruit outstanding faculty and be equipped with high quality facilities. Although this national policy has come into being for more than a decade, limited empirical studies have been conducted to examine how the policy influences students’ performance as well as whether the policy is perceived to interfere with test fairness. Using differential item analysis (DIF) and content analysis, this study examined the effect of group membership (key vs. non-key universities) on one of the large-scale high-stakes language tests–the Graduate School Entrance English Examination (GSEEE). The results identified a number of DIF/DBF, all favoring test takers from key universities. A review of the flagged items by three test reviewers found a myriad of potential factors including unbalanced learning opportunities, which may contribute to performance differences between two groups. However, none of the reviewers deemed that unbalanced educational opportunities brought bias and presented a threat to fairness. Fairness in this context is conceptualized to require individuals or groups who are less well-off to sacrifice social benefits and resources to those who are better off to achieve the overarching aim of maximizing economic benefit to the society.

Educational Policy Text's Ambiguity and Strategic Reading:Policy on National Certificate and Degree Examination of Non-governmental Higher Education Institutions as Example

Types and Production of Educational Policy Text:Take Pilot Policy of National Certificate and Degree Examination in Non-governmental Higher Education Institutions as Example

Rules and Administrative Discretion in Educational Policy-Making: with Special Reference to Two Non-governmental Higher Education Policies

Governing through ambiguity in the normalizing society: The lesson from Chinese transnational higher education regulation

Achieving Balance among Competing Challenges in Chinese Higher Education

Conceptual Categories of Educational Policy Instruments:a Preliminary Analysis of Beijing Private Higher Education Policy Texts

Policy Experimentation and Power Negotiation in China’s Higher Education Reforms

The Effect of a National Education Policy on Language Test Performance: a Fairness Perspective

Progressing to China-related careers: unveiling the hidden curriculum in Chinese international higher education

Experimental Governance in China's Higher Education: Stakeholder's Interpretations, Interactions and Strategic Actions

Power relations in the enactment of English language education policy for Chinese schools

Economic Analysis of Policies of China's Private Education

An Analysis on the Interactive Relation of National Policy Orientationand Higher Education

An Analysis of the Theoretical Models of Implementation of Educational Policies

‘FROM POINT TO SURFACE’: THE ROLE OF POLICY EXPERIMENTATION IN CHINESE HIGHER EDUCATION REFORMS

The Application of Policy Instruments in China's Ethnic Education Reform:A Text Analysis

Private Higher Education in China: Access to Quality Higher Education and the Acquisition of Labour Market Qualifications by Low-Income Students1

Learning to ‘tell China's story well’: the constructions of international students in Chinese higher education policy

Research on China's Higher Education Policy

Towards a multilayered and multidimensional analysis of multilingual education: ideologies of multilingualism and language planning in Chinese higher education