Rules and Administrative Discretion in Educational Policy-Making: with Special Reference to Two Non-governmental Higher Education Policies

LIN Xiao-ying
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-4519.2007.04.015
2007-01-01
Abstract:This research s the relationship between rules and administrative discretion in the process of educational policy-making, with special reference to two non-governmental higher educational policies. The main findings are at the following. First, educational authorities at higher levels dominates the policy-making process prescribes for those at lower levels basic preconditions concerning both value and fact. Secondly, educational authorities at lower level still have relatively extensive discretion, which benefits policy innovation and dissemination. Thirdly, educational authorities at lower levels may use their discretion to intervene policy-making. This action blurs the boundary between policy making and its implementation, thus renders educational policy-making as an up-and-down interactive process. Fourthly, for local educational authorities which are also policy implementation institutions, how to define their behavior and policy effects is closely related to how to their status and identity and their credibility within the entire education sector. It proved ineffective to limit administrative discretion through tightening rules and procedures.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?