Two New Year Celebrations in the Chinese Calendar As One Rite of Passage:A Representation of the Relation of New Year and Spring Festival

GAO Bing-zhong
2007-01-01
Abstract:Ever since China became modern nation-state in 1911, there emerged the phenomenon of two New Year celebrations in one calendric year. The new calendar's (the Gregorian calendar) First Dawn (of New Year) and abandoned traditional calendar's Spring Festival have been among the conflictive swirls between the modern and the traditional, the western and the native, both in struggling for the influence on citizens' life as well as the legitimate status in the official time system. No matter in common sense or academic expressions, the First Dawn and Spring Festival are always treated as separate, even opposite and conflictive holidays.But whether by the theory of Rite of Passage or our life experience, “celebrating the New Year” should be (or, can only be) a rite of passage no matter how many rituals there are. So I'd like to discuss the possibility and how to combine the First Dawn and Spring Festival into one rite of passage about annual time cycle and further discuss the social meaning of knowledge production about the reconfiguration of the New Year celebration whose cultural elements can be traced to plural origins. What I'll especially emphasize is that despite we live in a compound culture, if some new classification categories can be adopted, there's still a chance for us to pull ourselves away from those disputes bundled with oversimplified opposition such as the Chinese and the west, the modern and the traditional.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?