“Returning Home” or “Being Returned Home”?

Song Shaopeng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137550804_3
2016-01-01
Abstract:Every year, in early March, thousands of delegates to the National People’s Congress (NPC)—the legislature of the People’s Republic of China (PRC)—and the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC) gather together in Beijing for the Lianghui Meetings, generating an atmosphere of lively debate. Since International Women’s Day, March 8, falls during the two sessions of the meetings, the Chinese media always takes this opportunity to turn the spotlight on female delegates and file stories about women and gender issues. There was a time when the day was known in China as “International Women’s Labor Day,” but the term “labor” has quietly disappeared, and political celebration has given way to a day of leisure and consumption without any officially organized activities. In the days immediately before and after March 8 in 2011, however, two controversial law proposals concerning gender issues attracted great attention and triggered a heated public debate in the media. One was the proposal “Encouraging Some Women to Return Home,” put forward by a female member of the CPPCC National Committee, Zhang Xiaomei (Zhang 2011), and another was the proposal for the same “Retirement Age for Men and Women” (Yu and Cheng 2011).
What problem does this paper attempt to address?