Abstract:Background context: A few studies have already investigated the influences of functional structures of the cervical spine on its biomechanical behavior. In most studies, this has been done by measuring the range of motion. However, this parameter lacks of qualitative information about the overall kinematic behavior, such as coupled motions or translations. These data are essential for future development of cervical implants and surgical techniques. Purpose: An investigation of the influences of cervical structures on the kinematic behavior of the cervical spine under in vivo conditions is almost impossible due to ethical reasons. Therefore, an in vitro study was conducted which allowed the analysis of these influences using three-dimensional helical axes. Study design/setting: An in vitro test applying pure moments on mono-segmental specimens was designed in order to investigate the influences of a series of structures on the kinematic behavior of the cervical spine using three-dimensional helical axes. Methods: In this study we extracted motion segments C2-C3, C4-C5, and C6-C7 from 6 human cadaveric specimens with an average age of 48 years. The specimens were carefully selected using X-ray images. For the in vitro experiments, seven states were defined. The first state represented the intact state of each specimen. The remaining six states correspond with the subsequent resection of the following structures in the given order: interspinous ligament, ligamentum flavum, facet capsule, vertebral arch, posterior longitudinal ligament, and anterior longitudinal ligament. Each state was tested using a well-established spine tester. Each test sequence included 3.5 quasi-static motion cycles in all three bending directions using pure moments of 1 Nm. All motions were recorded using a motion tracking device and six reflective markers which were attached to the specimens. The recordings were then used to calculate the 3D helical axes, which were matched with the X-ray images. Due to the small number of specimens, qualitative results, such as the helical axes, were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: In general, the overall range of motion was increased in all loading directions due to the resection steps. The least change in the kinematic behavior of the cervical spine was observed during flexion/extension. For lateral bending and axial rotation the greatest change in the pattern of the helical axes was observed during the resection of the vertebral arch. For some specimens, however, typical patterns regarding the orientation of the helical axes remained until the last state. For lateral bending, it could be observed that the deviation in the axes' orientation increased whereas for axial rotation it decreased. Conclusion: Resection of the cervical ligaments are much less crucial than the removal of guiding structures such as the facet joint. Furthermore, coupled motions not only result from the orientations of the articular surfaces of the facet joints but also from the overall shape of the cervical vertebrae including the uncinate processes. Clinical significance: It is well-known that coupled motions play a substantial role in cervical kinematics. However, the influences of cervical structures on the overall kinematic behavior of the cervical spine are not yet fully understood. Knowledge of these influences could help to reduce or even prevent iatrogenic degeneration after surgical intervention. Furthermore, the data provided by this study can be helpful for future developments of cervical implants as well as finite element models for more advanced numerical investigations.

[Three-Dimensional Anatomical Position of Rotatory Center in Cervical Rotatory and Local Manipulation].

An in vivo, three-dimensional, functional centers of rotation of the healthy cervical spine

Anatomical measurements and clinical significance of anterior atlantoaxial transarticular screw fixation

[Treatment Strategy of Rotatory Dislocation of Atlantoaxial Articulation in Children].

Cervical rotational osteotomy for correction of axial deformity in a patient with ankylosing spondylitis

Establishment of Finite Element Model of Anterior Cervical Transpedicular System for Reconstruction of Cervical Stabili-Ty after Subtotal Resection of Two Segments of Lower Cervical Spine

Analysis of three-dimensional facet joint displacement during two passive upper cervical mobilizations

The relationship between three-dimensional principal rotations and mandibular deviation

Dynamic in vivo 3D atlantooccipital kinematics during multiplanar physiologic motions

In vivo three-dimensional intervertebral kinematics of the subaxial cervical spine during seated axial rotation and lateral bending via a fluoroscopy-to-CT registration approach

Validation and application of a novel in vivo cervical spine kinematics analysis technique

Does location of rotation center in artificial disc affect cervical biomechanics?

Biomechanical stability of atlantoaxial and occipitocervical fixations with unilateral spinous process screw plus contralateral pedicle screw: a finite element analysis

Comparison of biomechanical parameters of two Chinese cervical spine rotation manipulations based on motion capture and finite element analysis

Finite Element Analysis of Influence of Axial Position of Center of Rotation of a Cervical Total Disc Replacement on Biomechanical Parameters: Simulated 2-Level Replacement Based on a Validated Model.

[Study of Pedicle Screw Placement Assisted by Intraoperative Three-Dimensional Navigation in Lumbar Vertebrae with Axial Rotation].

Influences of functional structures on the kinematic behavior of the cervical spine

Relationship of the centric relation position of condyle between self-controlled retruded approach and bimanual manipulation

[An in vitro experimental study for 3D motion analysis of the cervical spine with the ACP].

Assessment of atlantoaxial rotation: how accurate is clinical measurement? a comparative study of cervical range of motion using MRI and standard orthopedic techniques

Can Femoral Rotation Be Localized and Quantified Using Standard CT Measures?