Analysis of correlation between individual factors and objective image quality in adults abdominal CT

WANG Qian,QI Wei-wei,FENG Shi-chao,ZHAO Xin-ming,MA Xiao-hong,WU Jing,ZHOU Chun-wu,HONG Nan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-9011.2013.03.032
2013-01-01
Journal of Medical Imaging
Abstract:Objective To investigate the relationship between the individualized factor in adult patients and objective image quality in abdominal CT.Methods From March 2012 to October 2012,one hundred and forty-four patients,who underwent clinical diagnosis or demand for treatment,were enrolled in this study and underwent non-contrast-enhanced abdominal CT scans in the constant tube current tube mode. All the individual variants,including height,weight,transverse diameter at the lever of LI pedicle and the first hepatic portal in positioning imaging,were measured and recorded.At the same time,percentage of fat content intra-abdominal and subcutaneous fat thickness data were also measured by X SECTION functions in 3D reformat software to explore the relationship between these individualized factors and objective image quality in abdominal CT.Results The correlative coefficients between height,weight,weightstatue-ratio,BMI,weight,transverse diameter at the lever of L1 pedicle,the maximum transverse diameter,the maximum anteroposterior diameter,the average maximum diameter of abdomen,visceral and subcutaneous fat measured values,and noise image quality were 0.267,0.702,0.7,0.661,0.744,0.739,0.712,0.765,0.613 and 0.431,respectively.Compared with transverse diameter at the lever of the first hepatic portal,transverse diameter at the lever of L1 pedicle showed greater relationship(R=0.931).Conclusion The correlative coefficients between all the individualized factors involved in our study and objective image quality were 0.267-0.765.Of them,transverse diameter at the lever of L1 pedicle showed greatest relationship.In short,it can be used as a parameter adjusting the scanning paramerers in abdominal CT of adults.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?