Risk factor and angiograph comparison of myocardial infarction between Chinese and Australians

JIANG Shi-sen,HUANG Zhe-yong,XU Dong-jin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-8199.2007.06.017
2007-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To compare the cardiovascular risk factors and the characteristics of coronary lesion between Chinese and Australian patients with myocardial infarction(MI). Methods:Five hundred and seventy-eight Chinese and 399 Australian MI patients received selective coronary angiography after hospitalization.The cardiovascular risk factors and coronary angiograms were compared and analyzed.Results:Five hundred and fifty Chinese cases(95.16%)and 376 Australian cases(94.24%)showed angiographically coronary stenosis.The comparing results of MI cases between Chinese and Australians were as follows:the percentage of patients below 40 years old,2.08% vs 6.02%(P<0.05);the percentage of males,85.6% vs 79.7%(P=0.015);the percentage of patients with hypertension and hyperlipemia,58.65% vs 28.57% and 11.59% vs 68.42%,respectively(P<0.01),the percentage of patients with diabetes,17.30% vs 16.29%(P>0.05);the percentage of patients with three vessel disease and total occlusion,32.87% vs 24.31% and 45.50% vs 32.33%,respectively(P<0.01);incidences of involved coronary arteries,for both Chinese and Australians,were in a descending order for left anterior descending branch,right coronary artery,left circumflex branch and left main coronary artery.Chinese see the highest MI incidence(29.58%) among patients in their 70 s while Australians in their 50 s are most prone to MI(32.08%).Conclusion:Compared with Australians,Chinese MI patients feature a smaller proportion of young people,a higher incidence of hypertension and a lower incidence of hyperlipemia.Multiple vessel stenosis and total occlusion are more popular in Chinese.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?