Judiciary Independence and The Enforcement of Investor Protection Laws: Market Responses to the "1/15" Notice of the Supreme People's Court of China

Xinyuan C,Mochou L,Lijun X

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13821/j.cnki.ceq.2010.01.005

2010-01-01

Abstract:Taking advantage of the issuance of the of the Supreme People's Court on the Relevant Issues Concerning the Acceptance of Cases of Disputes over Civil Torts Arising from False Statements in the Securities Market (Hereafter 1/15 Notice) in China on January 15,2002,this paper investigates the effects of judiciary independence on the enforcement of investor protection laws. The sample is comprised of listed firms engaged in actual or suspected false statements. We classify the firms into higher judiciary independence group and lower judiciary independence group depending on where their headquarters are located. We find that around the issuance of the 1/15 Notice,the stock price response of the sample firms is significantly negative;moreover,compared with the firms in the higher judiciary independence group,those in the lower judiciary independence group have less negative stock price response. The results indicate that investors tend to believe that 1/15 Notice and its related investor protection laws are likely to be enforced to some extent,but the potential influence of local governments on local courts lowers the probability of the enforcement.