Clinical Analysis of Reoperation for the Treatment of Hemifacial Spasm with Microvascular Decompression: a Report of 15 Cases

FU Yong-qiang,TU Jin-quan,WEI Ming-ran,ZHOU Li,FAN Xiao-jun,LIU Ru-en
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-6350.2011.24.036
2011-01-01
Abstract:Objective To study the causes of ineffectiveness of microvascular decompression (MVD) and need for reoperation in the treatment of hemifacial spasm (HFS). Methods Reoperative MVD was performed in 15 HFS patients undergoing previous ineffective MVD. In the patients, the main causes of ineffectiveness included misjudgment of compressing vessels (5 cases), improper insertion of decompressing grafts (8 cases), improper selection of grafts (1 case) and small grafts (1 case). Results Symptoms of HFS disappeared immediately after reoperative MVD in 14 patients and the symptoms of HFS improved significantly in 1 patient which delayed for 1 month. No recurrence of HFS was found during the follow-up of 1.0~3.0 years (with a mean of 2.5 years). Conclusion MVD is an effective treatment for HFS. Exposing root exit Zone (REZ) during operation, accurately identifying the offending vessels, fully decompressing of REZ, as well as the size of graft and location of graft placed, are the important factors influencing surgical efficacy.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?