Abstract:Background: Class V lesions present a clinical challenge due to their location at the cervical region of teeth, where factors such as microleakage and polymerization shrinkage can compromise the longevity of restorations. Self-adhesive flowable composites offer the advantage of simplified application, but their sealing ability may vary based on different restorative techniques. This in vitro study aimed to compare the sealing ability of two self-adhesive flowable composites, Clearfil S3 Universal and G-Premio Bond, when applied using various restorative techniques in Class V lesions. Materials and Methods: Eighty extracted human premolars were selected and randomly divided into two groups, with each group treated with one of the two self-adhesive flowable composites. Class V cavities were prepared on the buccal surfaces of the teeth. Four restorative techniques were employed: Group A - Direct application of the composite; Group B - Application of the composite with a bonding agent (Clearfil SE Bond); Group C - Application of the composite with selective enamel etching; Group D - Application of the composite with a dentin adhesive (G-Premio Bond) and selective enamel etching. After restoration, the teeth were subjected to thermocycling, immersed in methylene blue dye, sectioned, and evaluated for dye penetration under a stereomicroscope. The extent of dye penetration was quantified and statistically analyzed.Results:The results showed that Group D, where G-Premio Bond was used with selective enamel etching, demonstrated the least dye penetration (mean value X) compared to the other groups (X1, X2, X3). The differences in sealing ability between the groups were statistically significant (p < 0.05). Clearfil S3 Universal showed better sealing ability when used with a bonding agent (Group B) compared to direct application (Group A). Conclusion: In Class V restorations, the choice of self-adhesive flowable composite and restorative technique significantly affects sealing ability. G-Premio Bond, in combination with selective enamel etching, provided superior sealing compared to other techniques. Clearfil S3 Universal performed better when used with a bonding agent. These findings highlight the importance of selecting the appropriate material and technique for Class V restorations to minimize microleakage and improve clinical outcomes. Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science Vol.23 (Special Issue) 2024 p.S92-S96

Comparison of Marginal Microleakage of Solitaire with Other Restorative Materials in Vitro

Comparing Marginal Microleakage of Three Different Dental Materials in Veneer Restoration Using a Stereomicroscope: an in Vitro Study.

Microleakage of three dentin adhesive systems in Class V restorations

An in Vitro Evaluation of Coronal Microleakage of Five Temporary Restorative Materials Used in Endodontic Access Cavities

Effects of matching adhesives and composite resins on microleakage

Comparative research on marginal microleakage of everStick fibre reinforced composites resin and porcelain laminate veneer

The Research on the Microleakage After Bonding Vertical Fractured posterior Teeth using Three Different Bonding Materials

An In Vitro Comparative Evaluation of the Effects of Different Bleaching Agents on Marginal Integrity of Two Different Restorative Resin Materials: An Analysis by Confocal Laser Microscopy

The effects of the compatibility between resins and different adhesives on the shear bond strength and micro-leakage

Comparison of the marginal microleakage of a bioactive composite resin and traditional dental restorative materials

Comparative evaluation of microleakage between bulk esthetic materials versus resin-modified glass ionomer to restore Class II cavities in primary molars

Compartive study of microleakage by using four types of luting agents in glass-infiltrated alumina core ceramic

[Influence of Different Resin Bond Systems on Coronal Microleakage of Fiber Posts and Core Restorations].

Marginal adaptation and microleakage of five root-end filling materials: an in vitro study

Effect of blood and artificial saliva contamination on marginal adaptation and sealing ability of different retrograde filling materials: A comparative analysis

Comparative evaluation of sealing ability of two self-adhesive flowable composites following various restorative techniques in Class V lesions: An in vitro study

Comparison of Marginal Seal and Tensile Bond Strength of an Alkasite, Zircomer, and Bulk Fill Composite to Carious Affected Primary Molars

Genetic evaluation of recombinant inbred lines of rice (Oryza sativa L.) for grain zinc concentrations, yield related traits and identification of associated SSR markers.

Study on microleakage of two kinds of complexes exerted by different depth of cavities and curing time

Microleakage Evaluation of the Use of Different Bonding Agents Before Fissure Sealing

Experimental Study of Compomer Sealant with Non-Rinse Conditioner Used on Permanent Molar