Abstract:The system of remanding judgment in civil litigation has aroused complaints among scholars,judges,lawyers and the public,which has rendered it necessary to amend the related articles in the Civil Procedure Law.As there is no essential consensus between scholars,judges and lawyers upon this system,it is necessary to develop an "ought to be" interpretation in law.In order to limit the abuse of discretion in remanding judgments in civil cases,Chinese courts have implemented an approach that stresses detailed procedures through local rules and enhances organizational management measures.Compared to the western countries' courts,Chinese courts are unique bureaucratic organizations that adjudication and(judicial) administration are integrated and the presidents have the overall responsibility for organizational performance such as judicial quality and efficiency and resources arrangement.However,such a model of "judicial procedure under the control of organizational management" can not avoid the appellate courts' abuse of discretion by remanding judgments against relevant statutory provisions,regardless of the appealed issues and without judicial reasoning,but instead deprives the litigating parties and the public in general of their participation in the civil procedures,thus damages further the authority of judicial adjudication. Of course,as Chinese judges lack enough professionalization and socialization,it is necessary and reasonable to strengthen and regulate organizational management of judicial adjudication in China nowadays.To adjust the relationship between judicial procedure and court organization,the autonomy of judicial procedure should be guaranteed in the background of organizational management and parties' participation in judicial procedure should be restored.The reasoning for remanding orders,which is bound by the appellants' claims and justified by judges themselves,is the key factor to guarantee the autonomy of adjudication.Therefore,the most important improvement about the remanding system should focus upon the judicial reasoning contained in orders in addition to amending the statutory conditions set forth for remanding.

Post-holding Script: A Genre Analysis

The Summary of Studies on Juristic Character of Main Types of Transference of Rural Land Contract and Operation Rights

A semiotic interpretation of genre: Judgments as an example

Analysis on the Concept of the Holding Crime

On Administrative Litigation's Performing Legal Duty Judgment

The Inherent Character of Holding

Analysis on Option Contracts of Investment Hold-Up

Revisiting Judgment Translation in Hong Kong

Documentary Evidence As Hegemonic Reconstruction

Attribution and Judicial Control in Chinese Court Judgments: a Corpus-Based Study

The historical Development of the Postfield in written German and its cognitive Justification: A corpus-based Study

A Case-Based Study Of Jury Instructions In Hong Kong

Comparative Study on Hedges in Chinese and American Courtroom Discourse

A Discursive Analytical Path of Appellate Court Opinions: Evaluation of Ideological Positioning in Bush V. Gore 2000

Modals and Modality in Legal Discourse: A Corpus-Based Sociosemiotic Interpretation

Epistemic modality in court judgments: A corpus-driven comparison of civil cases in Hong Kong and Scotland

A Pragmatic Turn In The Interpretation Of Court Judgments

Modals and Modality in Legal Discourse

Gauging Court Adjudication: Qualification And Quantification

A Brief Discussion of the Writing Characteristics in the Transition from Seal Script to Clerical Script

Reflection on the System of Remanding Judgment in Civil Procedure