Abstract:Hydrological models have been developed in response to the need to understand the complex water cycle of the Earth and to assess its interaction with historical and future climate scenarios. In the global water sector of the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project phase 2b (ISIMIP2b), six land surface models (LSMs), eight hydrological models (GHMs), and one dynamic vegetation model (DGVM) are contributing with transient simulations spanning from 1660 to 2300. The model simulations follow a common protocol and are driven by common bias adjusted climate model outputs combined with plausible socio-economic scenarios and representative concentration pathways. The main goal of this study is to highlight similarities and differences among these models in simulating the vertical water balance. The main similarity of these models consists in the water cycle simulation, even if the models have been developed for different purposes such as energy cycle (LSMs), water cycle (GHMs), or vegetation cycle (DGVM) simulation. In particular, we address the following research question: 1) what equations are used to compute water storages and water fluxes; 2) how different are the equations among the models; 3) how the equations were adjusted; 4) how many parameters are used by the models; 5) how often the parameters are used; 6) how similar or different are the parameters among the models. To this end, we apply a standard writing style of the water storages and water fluxes included in the models, to easily identify the similarities and differences among them. Most of the models include in their structure the canopy, soil, and snow storages, and almost half of them include the groundwater storage. Furthermore, we find that: 1) a model needs a very good documentation, this would help to easily identify and understand the equations in the code; 2) some modelers teams use common approaches resulting in similar equations of water storages or water fluxes, but different models structures still lead to different models results; 3) collaboration and communication among the modelers are necessary, on the one hand, for the realization of the models standard writing style, and on the other hand, for a better understanding of the models themselves, especially their strengths, limitations and results. Overall, our results (i) help to better explain the different models results and to attribute these to the differences in simulating specific processes; (ii) contribute to the remarkable efforts in creating a common protocol and a common input datasets for well-defined simulations; (iii) foster a better understanding of how the models work and finding new ways of improvement and development.

Methodology and Comparative Study of Monthly Water Balance Models in Belgium, China and Burma

Hydrological Simulation and Runoff Component Analysis over a Cold Mountainous River Basin in Southwest China

Estimation of Watershed Hydrologic Processes in Arid Conditions with a Modified Watershed Model

Impact Of Two Calibration Strategies On Flow Simulation In Qiantang River Basin, China

Simulation of Monthly Runoff Considering Flow Components in Yarlung Zangbo River

Baseflow Separation Based on A Meteorology-Corrected Nonlinear Reservoir Algorithm in A Typical Rainy Agricultural Watershed

Similarities and Differences among Fifteen Global Water Models in Simulating the Vertical Water Balance

Role of Satellite and Reanalysis Precipitation Products in Streamflow and Sediment Modeling over a Typical Alpine and Gorge Region in Southwest China.

A Two-parameter Monthly Water Balance Model and Its Application in Hanjiang River Basin

Do Model Parameters Change under Changing Climate and Land Use in the Upstream of the Lancang River Basin, China?

Behind the scenes of runoff performance

Factors influencing calibration of a semi-distributed mixed runoff hydrological model: A study on nine small mountain catchments in China

Comparing The Hydrological Responses Of Conceptual And Process-Based Models With Varying Rain Gauge Density And Distribution

Intercomparison of ten ISI-MIP models in simulating discharges along the Lancang-Mekong River basin

Comparison of the various methodologies used in studying runoff and sediment load in the Yellow River Basin

Hydrological modelling with an improved flexible hybrid runoff generation strategy

Comparative study of semi-distributed and 2D-distributed hydrological models for streamflow prediction in a data scarce mountainous watershed

A unified framework of water balance models for monthly, annual, and mean annual timescales

Entropy Theory Based Multi-Criteria Resampling of Rain Gauge Networks for Hydrological Modelling – A Case Study of Humid Area in Southern China

Analysis of Catchment Evapotranspiration at Different Scales Using Bottom-Up and Top-Down Approaches

Modelling Hydrologic Processes In The Mekong River Basin Using A Distributed Model Driven By Satellite Precipitation And Rain Gauge Observations