Abstract:Hydrological models have been developed in response to the need to understand the complex water cycle of the Earth and to assess its interaction with historical and future climate scenarios. In the global water sector of the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project phase 2b (ISIMIP2b), six land surface models (LSMs), eight hydrological models (GHMs), and one dynamic vegetation model (DGVM) are contributing with transient simulations spanning from 1660 to 2300. The model simulations follow a common protocol and are driven by common bias adjusted climate model outputs combined with plausible socio-economic scenarios and representative concentration pathways. The main goal of this study is to highlight similarities and differences among these models in simulating the vertical water balance. The main similarity of these models consists in the water cycle simulation, even if the models have been developed for different purposes such as energy cycle (LSMs), water cycle (GHMs), or vegetation cycle (DGVM) simulation. In particular, we address the following research question: 1) what equations are used to compute water storages and water fluxes; 2) how different are the equations among the models; 3) how the equations were adjusted; 4) how many parameters are used by the models; 5) how often the parameters are used; 6) how similar or different are the parameters among the models. To this end, we apply a standard writing style of the water storages and water fluxes included in the models, to easily identify the similarities and differences among them. Most of the models include in their structure the canopy, soil, and snow storages, and almost half of them include the groundwater storage. Furthermore, we find that: 1) a model needs a very good documentation, this would help to easily identify and understand the equations in the code; 2) some modelers teams use common approaches resulting in similar equations of water storages or water fluxes, but different models structures still lead to different models results; 3) collaboration and communication among the modelers are necessary, on the one hand, for the realization of the models standard writing style, and on the other hand, for a better understanding of the models themselves, especially their strengths, limitations and results. Overall, our results (i) help to better explain the different models results and to attribute these to the differences in simulating specific processes; (ii) contribute to the remarkable efforts in creating a common protocol and a common input datasets for well-defined simulations; (iii) foster a better understanding of how the models work and finding new ways of improvement and development.

Intercomparison of ten ISI-MIP models in simulating discharges along the Lancang-Mekong River basin

Impact Of Two Calibration Strategies On Flow Simulation In Qiantang River Basin, China

Similarities and Differences among Fifteen Global Water Models in Simulating the Vertical Water Balance

Adaptive Assessment of Reservoir Scheduling to Hydrometeorological Comprehensive Dry and Wet Condition Evolution in a Multi-Reservoir Region of Southeastern China

Understanding Each Other's Models: an Introduction and a Standard Representation of 16 Global Water Models to Support Intercomparison, Improvement, and Communication

Multi-criteria Evaluation of Discharge Simulation in Dynamic Global Vegetation Models

Integrated Hydrologic and Hydrodynamic Models to Improve Flood Simulation Capability in the Data-Scarce Three Gorges Reservoir Region

How well do the multi-satellite and atmospheric reanalysis products perform in hydrological modelling

Modeling Daily Floods in the Lancang‐Mekong River Basin Using an Improved Hydrological‐Hydrodynamic Model

Role of Satellite and Reanalysis Precipitation Products in Streamflow and Sediment Modeling over a Typical Alpine and Gorge Region in Southwest China.

The Critical Role of the Routing Scheme in Simulating Peak River Discharge in Global Hydrological Models

Global evaluation of runoff simulation from climate, hydrological and land surface models

Coupled Hydrologic and Hydraulic Modeling for a Lowland River Basin in China

Integrated Approach to Mekong River Flow Modeling: Data Gaps and Climate Trends

Integrated numerical model for irrigated area water resources management

Study of Flood Simulation in Small and Medium-Sized Basins Based on the Liuxihe Model

Modelling Hydrologic Processes In The Mekong River Basin Using A Distributed Model Driven By Satellite Precipitation And Rain Gauge Observations

Identification of uncertainty sources in quasi-global discharge and inundation simulations using satellite-based precipitation products

Global hydrological models continue to overestimate river discharge

Cross‐scale intercomparison of climate change impacts simulated by regional and global hydrological models in eleven large river basins

Application of ESSI Distributed Hydrological Model in Huaihe River Basin