A Constructive Bound on Kissing Numbers

Chaoping Xing

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/s0002-9939-09-09888-8

IF: 0.9709

2009-01-01

Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society

Abstract:In the present paper, by making use of the concatenation of 17(2) - 1 = 288 points on the sphere of radius 4 in R(16) and subcodes of algebraic geometry codes over F(17)(2), we improve the best-known constructive bound on kissing numbers by A. Vardy.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Improved kissing numbers in seventeen through twenty-one dimensions

Henry Cohn,Anqi Li

2024-11-08

Abstract:We prove that the kissing numbers in 17, 18, 19, 20, and 21 dimensions are at least 5730, 7654, 11692, 19448, and 29768, respectively. The previous records were set by Leech in 1967, and we improve on them by 384, 256, 1024, 2048, and 2048. Unlike the previous constructions, the new configurations are not cross sections of the Leech lattice minimal vectors. Instead, they are constructed by modifying the signs in the lattice vectors to open up more space for additional spheres.

Metric Geometry,Combinatorics
New lower bounds on kissing numbers and spherical codes in high dimensions

Irene Gil Fernández,Jaehoon Kim,Hong Liu,Oleg Pikhurko

2023-12-18

Abstract:Let the kissing number $K(d)$ be the maximum number of non-overlapping unit balls in $\mathbb R^d$ that can touch a given unit ball. Determining or estimating the number $K(d)$ has a long history, with the value of $K(3)$ being the subject of a famous discussion between Gregory and Newton in 1694. We prove that, as the dimension $d$ goes to infinity, $$ K(d)\ge (1+o(1)){\frac{\sqrt{3\pi}}{4\sqrt2}}\,\log\frac{3}{2}\cdot d^{3/2}\cdot \Big(\frac{2}{\sqrt{3}}\Big)^{d}, $$ thus improving the previously best known bound of Jenssen, Joos and Perkins by a factor of $\log(3/2)/\log(9/8)+o(1)=3.442...$. Our proof is based on the novel approach from Jenssen, Joos and Perkins that uses the hard core sphere model of an appropriate fugacity. Similar constant-factor improvements in lower bounds are also obtained for general spherical codes, as well as for the expected density of random sphere packings in the Euclidean space $\mathbb R^d$.

Combinatorics
The kissing number in 48 dimensions for codes with certain forbidden distances is 52 416 000

Peter Boyvalenkov,Danila Cherkashin

2023-12-08

Abstract:We prove that the kissing number in 48 dimensions among antipodal spherical codes with certain forbidden inner products is 52\,416\,000. Constructions of attaining codes as kissing configurations of minimum vectors in even unimodular extremal lattices are well known since the 1970's. We also prove that corresponding spherical 11-designs with the same cardinality are minimal. We use appropriate modifications of the linear programming bounds for spherical codes and designs introduced by Delsarte, Goethals and Seidel in 1977.

Combinatorics
Some remarks concerning kissing numbers, blocking numbers and covering numbers

Chuanming Zong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01876622

2005-01-01

Periodica Mathematica Hungarica

Abstract:This article shows an inequality concerning blocking numbers and Hadwiger's covering numbers and presents a strange phenomenon concerning kissing numbers and blocking numbers. As a simple corollary, we can improve the known upper bounds for Hadwiger's covering numbers ford-dimensional centrally symmetric convex bodies to 3d-1.
The kissing numbers of tetrahedra

Chuanming Zong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02711493

1996-01-01

Discrete & Computational Geometry

Abstract:We determine the lattice kissing numbers of tetrahedra, by which we disprove a conjecture by Grünbaum. At the same time, we present a strange phenomenon concerning kissing numbers and packing densities of tetrahedra.
Functional Delsarte-Goethals-Seidel-Kabatianskii-Levenshtein-Pfender Bound

K. Mahesh Krishna

2024-11-07

Abstract:Pfender \textit{[J. Combin. Theory Ser. A, 2007]} provided a one-line proof for a variant of the Delsarte-Goethals-Seidel-Kabatianskii-Levenshtein upper bound for spherical codes, which offers an upper bound for the celebrated (Newton-Gregory) kissing number problem. Motivated by this proof, we introduce the notion of codes in pointed metric spaces (in particular on Banach spaces) and derive a nonlinear (functional) Delsarte-Goethals-Seidel-Kabatianskii-Levenshtein-Pfender upper bound for spherical codes. We also introduce nonlinear (functional) Kissing Number Problem.

Functional Analysis,Combinatorics,Optimization and Control
On Generalized Kissing Numbers of Convex Bodies

Yiming Li,Chuanming Zong

2024-07-24

Abstract:In 1694, Gregory and Newton proposed the problem to determine the kissing number of a rigid material ball. This problem and its higher dimensional generalization have been studied by many mathematicians, including Minkowski, van der Waerden, Hadwiger, Swinnerton-Dyer, Watson, Levenshtein, Odlyzko, Sloane and Musin. In this paper, we introduce and study a further generalization of the kissing numbers for convex bodies and obtain some exact results, in particular for balls in dimensions three, four and eight.

Metric Geometry
The Translative Kissing Number of Cartesian Product of two Convex Bodies, one of which is Two-Dimensional

Chuan Ming Zong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004968518946

1997-01-01

Geometriae Dedicata

Abstract:This article discusses the relation between the translative kissing numbers of convex bodies K 1 , K 2 and K 1 ⊕ K 2 . As an application of the main theorem, we find that the translative kissing number of B ⊕ Q , where B is a 24-dimensional ball and Q is a two-dimensional non-parallelogram convex domain, is 1375926.
A note on five dimensional kissing arrangements

Ferenc Szöllősi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2301.08272

2023-01-19

Combinatorics

Abstract:The kissing number $\tau(d)$ is the maximum number of pairwise non-overlapping unit spheres each touching a central unit sphere in the $d$-dimensional Euclidean space. In this note we report on how we discovered a new, previously unknown arrangement of $40$ unit spheres in dimension $5$. Our arrangement saturates the best known lower bound on $\tau(5)$, and refutes a `belief' of Cohn--Jiao--Kumar--Torquato.
Difficulties Constructing Lattices with Exponential Kissing Number from Codes

Huck Bennett,Alexander Golovnev,Noah Stephens-Davidowitz

2024-10-22

Abstract:In this note, we present examples showing that several natural ways of constructing lattices from error-correcting codes do not in general yield a correspondence between minimum-weight non-zero codewords and shortest non-zero lattice vectors. From these examples, we conclude that the main results in two works of Vlăduţ (Moscow J. Comb. Number Th., 2019 and Discrete Comput. Geom., 2021) on constructing lattices with exponential kissing number from error-correcting codes are invalid. Exhibiting a family of lattices with exponential kissing number therefore remains an open problem.

Metric Geometry,Information Theory,Number Theory
The Kissing Numbers of Convex Bodies - A Brief Survey

C Zong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1112/s0024609397003408

IF: 1.036

1998-01-01

Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society

Abstract:Nearly four hundred years ago, the cubic close-packing of equal spheres in R3 was discovered by Kepler [21], in which each sphere touches 12 others. In 1694, Gregory and Newton discussed the following thirteen spheres problem. Can a rigid material sphere be brought into contact with 13 other such spheres of the same size? Gregory believed 'yes', while Newton thought 'no'. 1991 Mathematics Subject Classication 11H31, 52C17.
The kissing number, blocking number and covering number of a convex body

Chuanming Zong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/conm/453/08812

2008-01-01

Abstract:The kissing number and Hadwiger's covering number are two important and interesting numbers associated with a given convex body. They have been studied by many well-known mathematicians for decades. However, our knowledge about them is still very limited. The blocking number is a relatively new concept in Convex and Discrete Geometry. However, besides its own interest, it serves as a bridge between the kissing number and the covering number. This paper will review the basic problems and the main known results about these three numbers with an emphasis on their connections. In addition, it also contains some new results about Borsuk's problem in Minkowski spaces, the blocking numbers and Hadwiger's covering numbers.
Lattices with exponentially large kissing numbers do exist

Serge Vlăduţ

2024-11-12

Abstract:This note corrects the paper \cite{ex}, where lattice sequences having exponentially large kissing numbers were constructed. However it was noted in \cite{dif} that the arguments in that paper are not sufficient. Here we correct the construction which leads to similar results, albeit with much smaller constants.

Number Theory,Algebraic Geometry
An Example Concerning the Translative Kissing Number of a Convex Body

Chuanming Zong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02574374

1994-01-01

Discrete & Computational Geometry

Abstract:This article presents a class of convex bodies inE d (d≥3) where their maximum kissing numbers in translative packings are larger than their maximum kissing numbers in lattice packings.
On the maximum size packings of disks with kissing radius 3

Alexander Golovanov

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2140/moscow.2022.11.263

2022-06-01

Abstract:László Fejes Tóth and Aladár Heppes proposed the following generalization of the kissing number problem. Given a ball in $\mathbb{R}^d$, consider a family of balls touching it, and another family of balls touching the first family. Find the maximal possible number of balls in this arrangement, provided that no two balls intersect by interiors, and all balls are congruent. They showed that the answer for disks on the plane is $19$. They also conjectured that if there are three families of disks instead of two, the answer is $37$. In this paper we confirm this conjecture.

Metric Geometry,Combinatorics
Kissing Polytopes

Antoine Deza,Shmuel Onn,Sebastian Pokutta,Lionel Pournin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1137/24m1640859

IF: 0.868

2024-10-10

SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics

Abstract:SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics, Volume 38, Issue 4, Page 2643-2664, December 2024. We investigate the following question: How close can two disjoint lattice polytopes contained in a fixed hypercube be? This question stems from various contexts where the minimal distance between such polytopes appears in complexity bounds of optimization algorithms. We provide nearly matching bounds on this distance and discuss its exact computation. We also give similar bounds for disjoint rational polytopes whose binary encoding length is prescribed.

mathematics, applied
A counting formula for the Kervaire semi-characteristic Dedicated to Professor Yanlin Yu on his sixtieth birthday

Weiping Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-9383(99)00036-1

2000-01-01

Topology

Abstract:We establish a generic counting formula for the Kervaire semi-characteristic of 4q+1 dimensional manifolds.
Optimality and uniqueness of the $D_4$ root system

David de Laat,Nando M. Leijenhorst,Willem H. H. de Muinck Keizer

2024-05-27

Abstract:We prove that the $D_4$ root system (the set of vertices of the regular $24$-cell) is the unique optimal kissing configuration in $\mathbb R^4$, and is an optimal spherical code. For this, we use semidefinite programming to compute an exact optimal solution to the second level of the Lasserre hierarchy. We also improve the upper bound for the kissing number problem in $\mathbb R^6$ to $77$.

Metric Geometry,Optimization and Control
Upper Bounds for Non-Congruent Sphere Packings

Samuel Reid

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1510.00407

2015-09-29

Abstract:We prove upper bounds on the average kissing number $k(\mathcal{P})$ and contact number $C(\mathcal{P})$ of an arbitrary finite non-congruent sphere packing $\mathcal{P}$, and prove an upper bound on the packing density $\delta(\mathcal{P})$ of an arbitrary infinite non-congruent sphere packing $\mathcal{P}$.

Metric Geometry
A counting formula for the Kervaire semi-characteristic

Weiping Zhang

2000-01-01

Topology

Abstract:We establish a generic counting formula for the Kervaire semi-characteristic of 4q + 1 dimensional manifolds. © 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

A Constructive Bound on Kissing Numbers

Improved kissing numbers in seventeen through twenty-one dimensions

New lower bounds on kissing numbers and spherical codes in high dimensions

The kissing number in 48 dimensions for codes with certain forbidden distances is 52 416 000

Some remarks concerning kissing numbers, blocking numbers and covering numbers

The kissing numbers of tetrahedra

Functional Delsarte-Goethals-Seidel-Kabatianskii-Levenshtein-Pfender Bound

On Generalized Kissing Numbers of Convex Bodies

The Translative Kissing Number of Cartesian Product of two Convex Bodies, one of which is Two-Dimensional

A note on five dimensional kissing arrangements

Difficulties Constructing Lattices with Exponential Kissing Number from Codes

The Kissing Numbers of Convex Bodies - A Brief Survey

The kissing number, blocking number and covering number of a convex body

Lattices with exponentially large kissing numbers do exist

An Example Concerning the Translative Kissing Number of a Convex Body

On the maximum size packings of disks with kissing radius 3

Kissing Polytopes

A counting formula for the Kervaire semi-characteristic Dedicated to Professor Yanlin Yu on his sixtieth birthday

Optimality and uniqueness of the $D_4$ root system

Upper Bounds for Non-Congruent Sphere Packings

A counting formula for the Kervaire semi-characteristic